have seen it earlier, OK, dear Adrian! Peter On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:50 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Peter Gluck, > From Rossi's blog. > > Jones > March 20, 2016 at 8:15 AM > > DR Rossi – interesting comment on Vortex-L by a ashfield could you comment > on this: > > There must be an important clue in the new E-Cat X being so small – 100 > Watts. This would make a conventional control system for a large plant seem > excessive. I wonder is the new design is sufficiently stable that, after > start up, it can be controlled by varying the amount of electricity > extracted. > Andrea Rossi > March 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM > > Jones: > The comment on Vortex is intelligent. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > I take this to mean it was a good idea but not how it is done. Adding to > my previous thought, possibly if there is also a direct connection that > would allow electric power/magnetic field to be fed to the E-Cat quarkX > instead of heat. It would be easier to get a fast response. Wish we knew > more about the X type. > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
