saying it is a fraud seems not fair for me. Lugano report is visibly insufficient, unlike anything manufactured to look good.
Fraud looks perfect, that is a rule, and even a way to detect it. it is easier to make a fake report that looks perfect than to make a good one that looks fair. There is a problem, either on the measurement (bad IR emissivity), or on the justification of the measurement if their are not flawed (calibration). Sadly this happens not only with rossi. Hopefully there is very good reports in the domain. Note that Ferrara report is much better, and the only theory is a conspiracy theory which is not compatible with Lugano pathetic failure. And finally best report is Industrial Heat shares moves. 2016-03-21 17:56 GMT+01:00 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>: > For the record, this comment did not come from me. I do not waste time on > Rossi’s absurd blog for one thing. > > > > One the contrary, in my opinion there is no valid proof of any large > energy anomaly from Rossi which is not fully explained by Thermacore’s > earlier and better work - nor is it certain that there is a “customer” at > all - and a year’s worth of scientific data is extremely unlikely. > > > > The Lugano report was a fraud and an embarrassment to Levi and the Swedes > - and in all probability the same will hold true from any new report > –UNLESS Industrial Heat signs off on it. Otherwise, without IH fully > backing it – it is worthless. Will they back it? > > > > One cannot read the recent press releases from IH and not realize that > there could be trouble in paradise. In fact, they probably do not trust > Rossi much more than Gary Wright does. > > > > Jones > > > > *From:* Peter Gluck > > > > have seen it earlier, OK, dear Adrian! > > Peter > > > > > > a.ashfield wrote: > > > > Jones > March 20, 2016 at 8:15 AM > > DR Rossi – interesting comment on Vortex-L by a ashfield could you comment > on this: > > There must be an important clue in the new E-Cat X being so small – 100 > Watts. This would make a conventional control system for a large plant seem > excessive. I wonder is the new design is sufficiently stable that, after > start up, it can be controlled by varying the amount of electricity > extracted. > Andrea Rossi > March 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM > > Jones: > The comment on Vortex is intelligent. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > I take this to mean it was a good idea but not how it is done. Adding to > my previous thought, possibly if there is also a direct connection that > would allow electric power/magnetic field to be fed to the E-Cat quarkX > instead of heat. It would be easier to get a fast response. Wish we knew > more about the X type. > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Peter Gluck > > Cluj, Romania > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
