a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jed, > That is ridiculous. You can't say if a pipe has a flow meter or > thermocouple on it but you expect others to believe you that "the > measurements were flawed"! ? > Has Rossi told you anything about the configuration? Has he told you whether the pipe has a flowmeter or a thermocouple? You believe Rossi even though he has told you practically nothing. You do not believe me because I have told you nothing more than what Rossi said. You have a double standard! If you are not going to believe people who do not reveal all that they know, you should believe Rossi either. > It is starting to look like you don't have a clue what was there but are > just parroting what some anonymous person told you. > No, it isn't looking like that. Only in your imagination, perhaps. It looks like I have agreed not to discuss anything that Rossi and I.H. have not already revealed. > It smells when you ask me who told me that when you won't reveal your > source. > I told you my source: Rossi's data. Why does it not smell to you when Rossi reveals nothing? Why doesn't he give you the ERV report? > You say we should take your word for it but you can't take mine. > You have no information! You know nothing about this. No one should take your word for anything because you are merely speculating and guessing -- and guessing wrong in most cases. If you will not take my word for anything, then you should not take Rossi's either. He has not told you anything more than I have. - Jed
