Jed,
That is ridiculous. You can't say if a pipe has a flow meter or
thermocouple on it but you expect others to believe you that "the
measurements were flawed"! ? It is starting to look like you don't have
a clue what was there but are just parroting what some anonymous person
told you.
Re duplication of instruments, I think I remember Rossi make a comment
about how his measurements agreed with those of the ERV. I took that to
mean they both had instruments. There must have been some duplication
as I doubt the ERV's instrument output was used for control purposes.
It smells when you ask me who told me that when you won't reveal your
source. You say we should take your word for it but you can't take mine.
On 6/5/2016 7:27 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Jed,
Lets make this easy.
1. Did the return pipe from the customer, that was the input to
the 1 MW plant, have a flow meter and a thermocouple on it? . . .
I cannot discuss any details that have not yet been released by I.H.
or Rossi. I will say only that I agree with I.H. that the measurements
were flawed and the measuring devices unsuitable. As I said, the test
was a farce.
It is ambiguous but I think the instrumentation was duplicated in
some cases. ie Rossi and the ERV both had their own.
Who told you that? I have not heard anything like that. (I have not
heard it is true, or that it isn't.)
I think you should not speculate about things you know nothing about.
- Jed
