Really all that has to be proved is the water volume in and if the output is at 102.8C at atmospheric pressure, the output is dry steam and the heat transferred can be calculated. Also the electric power into the plant for the COP. It doesn't matter what happens after the steam leaves the plant. It could have been vented directly to the outside air. IH has to prove either the water flow is much less than claimed or the temperature is <100C or the pressure is above atmospheric. They have already stated (I think) that the pressure was atmospheric.
Further to my comment about Penon's report being key to the court case,
consider this.
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter described in court ... Axil Axil
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter described in court ... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter described in c... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter described ... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter described ... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter descri... Jed Rothwell