Whatever Sweet did or did not accomplish is now in the realm of
fiction. No scientific proof exists today in the form of a working
device, despite millions spent over the years.
There were eye witnesses who were experts in circuits who saw it
"working," but could not replicate it after years of trying. Bedini was
his assistant. This circumstance actually amounts more to proof of
trickery, than proof of an anomaly - since experts saw it and could not
replicate it.
Thus the best explanation is that Sweet was cleverly faking it. There
are a dozen ways to fake this kind of thing. YouTube has become a
repository of overunity fakes, some surprisingly good.
Common sense suggests that if Sweet's transformer ever worked, it would
have been replicated from available evidence and be in production today.
Of course, that has not happened. Thus it may have myth value to those
who want to believe in miracles, but none to science ... whereas the
Manelas device may have value to science in the anomalous cooling, if
not the battery effects.
People seem to be overlooking the implications of the "Gigafactory" in
Reno... in the context of combining low cost cells with a possible
doubling of battery-life with a regenerative circuit. No overunity
required. We could be looking at a bona-fide paradigm shift in the
history of transportation - if that were to happen...
... or it could be hype and spin. Indeed, the stock has been suffering
of late.
BTW Tesla's Gigafactory grand opening is set for *July 29th*.
Axil Axil wrote:
This battery theory does not make sense, The Sweet system worked with
power coming off the grid.
This is the same as saying that he could not close the loop. In short,
it never worked for Sweet as a self-powering device or he wouldn't need
the AC at all. He paid his full electric power bill like the rest of us.
