Dave- The “snap” you identify may be nothing more than a coherent system “phase change” nuclear potential energy to lattice electron mechanical energy.
It would be interesting to calculate or measure the increase in the magnetic system energy and compare to potential nuclear spin energy transitions for a match. BobCook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: David Roberson Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 8:43 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon Could this process be similar to the situation where positive feedback and a small input can be used to control a large amount of heat? It may be plausible that magnetism of a bulk object can be fine tuned so that a small external field addition coaxes it into a negative resistance region that is controllable. My work on positive feedback of heat within an LENR device might yield some interesting parallels. I have long thought that a square loop device such as core memory must behave in the manner that it does due to positive feedback effectively causing the net magnetization to snap into saturation once a threshold is exceeded. The key question is whether or not the degree of snap present within these systems can be modulated to exhibit the right characteristic. Could we be witnessing the careful adjustment of the positive feedback effect by 'conditioning the magnet' like Sweet or Manelas? I would expect the behavior to be critical as the amount of positive feedback is increased to just the right magnitude. This is an interesting question that begs for exploration. If we were quite lucky then another coupling mechanism exists where thermal energy of the bulk material is exchanged with magnetic energy during a trip throughout the positive feedback region. Sounds like too many miracles, but worth exploration. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, Mar 1, 2017 1:43 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon I have tried to understand the wiki article on Superparamagnetism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superparamagnetism It seems to me that the level of Superparamagnetism can be adjusted in such a way that a weak magnetic field can be applied to a ceramic magnet which is highly superparamagnetic to reduce that superparamagnetism and therefore the associated magnetic field of the magnet. This technique is used to write and erase bits onto the surface of a magnetic disk with a ceramic magnetic coating. The way this is done is to adjust the number of magnetic domains that are impressed into each and every nano particle that make up the structure of the ceramic magnet surface through a specialized demagnetization process. The way that the number of these magnetic domains are adjusted is done by demagnetizing the magnet using a magnetic field that includes a specific frequency. The magnetic domains within the nanoparticles become forever sensitive to that frequency. When this weak magnetic field is applied, the magnet becomes demagnetized through random thermal vibration. When this alternating magnetic field is removed, the magnetic field of the ceramic magnet returns. This process is just what happens in the magnetic conditioning of the billet, and the subsequent application of the weak activation magnetic field. This case is summarized by this snippet from the article >From this frequency-dependent susceptibility, the time-dependence of the >magnetization for low-fields can be derived: {\displaystyle \tau {\frac {\mathrm {d} M}{\mathrm {d} t}}+M=\tau \chi _{b}{\frac {\mathrm {d} H}{\mathrm {d} t}}+\chi _{sp}H} There is no time-dependence of the magnetization when the nanoparticles are either completely blocked ({\displaystyle T\ll T_{B}}) or completely superparamagnetic ({\displaystyle T\gg T_{B}}). The condition we want to get to is when T = TB, that is when the nanoparticles are right on the cutting edge between magnetism and diamagnetism, so that a tiny magnetic field can turn them off or on. I will add more detailed explanation if it looks like to you'll that there is something to this adjustment in the superpara-magnification of the ceramic billet to be sensitive to weak frequency-dependent magnetic fields. Opinions are welcome. On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then. It is difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect phonons with magnons. I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my tenure as a Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA. I 1988 I was tasked to understand the new cuprate superconductors. By shear luck I discovered that MIT Professor Keith Johnson had solved the problem five years earlier. In fact, his 1983 paper presented in Zurich directed Bednors and Meuller to work on the cuprates. Bedorz was the leader of the conference in 1983. He found that the superconduction arises when the Born-Oppenheimer conditions are not met. That is, when the valence electron motion is coupled to vibrational modes. The electrons are in molecular orbitals and magnetism exists under very specific orbital topologies. So magnetism (Specific electron orbitals conditions) and phonons can be coupled under specific orbital conditions and one combination is shallow well ferromagnetism. Like the superconductor coupling, specific coupling can lead to coherent behavior as well in a ferromagnetic system. More needs tobe said but there is some new physics at work in the Manelas billet. From: bobcook39...@gmail.com <bobcook39...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 1:56 PM To: Chris Zell; vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE Chris- I have understood that phonons are “virtual” particles that represent a localized energy in a crystal lattice made up of kinetic energy and potential energy in a resonant stable dynamic state. It is primarily thought to be an electric field that couples the nuclei and electrons in the lattice—primarily the valence electrons. The nuclei oscillate around some mid position in the lattice and valence electrons change their orbital spin states reflecting the motion of the nuclei. Temperature of the crystal lattice is a measure of the amplitude of the nuclei special displacement around their mid position in the lattice. If the crystal constitutes a coherent QM system, then all nuclei vibrate with the same amplitude and the crystal is at a single temperature. If the amplitude (temperature) get to high, the crystal electronic bonds fail and the order of the crystalline coherent system is lost. Magnetic fields change the nature of the potential/kinetic energy sharing. A preferred direction in the crystal is created relative to the magnetic B field that exists within the crystalline coherent system. The orbital spin energy states of the valence electrons are modified. Large B fields can cause large changes in these orbital spin states. If there are resonances between a nuclear orbital spin state of the coherent system and an electronic orbital spin state, it would seem possible that spin energy may be swapped, changing nuclear potential energy into PHONIC energy of the crystalline coherent system. A variable B field induced by a variable ambient H magnetic field will create a universe of differing spin energy states each with a small difference in it angular momentum. If total angular momentum can be conserved, IMHO A TRANSITION WILL OCCUR. It may be also possible that the transition is reversible. In such case a reduction of the temperature—lower electron orbital energy—would be the result. (Such a reversal suggests a new concept of temperature, one which shares potential and kinetic energy between nuclear entities and electrons. ) Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Chris Zell Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 9:35 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE I do recall Wingate Lambertson - a scientist/expert on cermet products. Odd semi-ceramic things he called “E-dams” that generated excess energy. I recall that he passed away before it could be fully developed. It all sounded like phonon derived energy. From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:14 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE Chris Zell wrote: If I google “phonons as an energy source”, nothing in particular comes up. If we are identifying them as the likely source of excess energy within a barium/strontium ferrite structure, I would think that someone somewhere has thought about cohering them into useful energy. But if you google "Microelectromechanical systems" you will get 750,000 hits.
