The nature of the magnetic field that activates the output of the billet must precisely match the magnetic field that conditioned the billet when the billet was demagnetized. The difference between these two fields must be in their power.
It orded that the billet not be damaged and made useless, the activation field must not exceed a maximum power level. The power source that drives the activation coil should be preset to not exceed that maximum activation coil driving current value. It is important to verified that the power level of the activation power source is fixed, If the frequency generator that produces the activation current is not fixed, then an experimental process must be instituted to make sure that the activation power feed does not exceed the maximum activation driving current. As a first step in the experimental process, please verify that the activation driver current produced by the frequency generator is fixed in such a way that neither the frequency characteristics nor the power level can be changed and in fact has not been changed from when the system was working. On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.rexresearch.com/sweet3/sweet3.htm > > In the last paragraph under section Magnet Material, the Sweet cookbook > states that the output coil was bifilar in order to keep the output current > induced by the billet from distorting the sensitive magnet activation > fields induced by the activation coil that was located around the edge of > the billet. The activation coil was positioned in an identical way as the > conditioning coil and produced a magnetic field with the same > characteristics as the field produced by the conditioning coil. > > The purpose of the activation coil is to produce a magnetic field that > drove the billet into a magnetically blocked state when that coil was > energized. When the activation coil was deenergized, the billet again > became magnetic, > > The magnetic field has a precise form that must not be changed by any > other source of magnetism. Such a source might be the output pickup coil. > This is why the output coil cannot generate any magnetic fields. Such a > field would scramble the character of the magnetic field of the activation > coil. For this reason, the output coil was constructed from bifilar wire. > > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The 3 most common uses for bifilar wire are: 1) to wind a transformer >> with a primary to secondary coupling constant that is very near 1.0 >> (maximum), 2) to use the wire as a foreshortened balanced transmission >> line, and 3) to create an unbalanced pair of coupled transmission lines >> with very high coupling factor. >> >> In the case of 1), high primary-secondary coupling transformer, by >> bifilar wire allows the turns to be wound in lock-step for both the primary >> and secondary. Bifilar is used for making a 1:1 transformer. If you want >> 1:2 or 2:1 transformer, then use trifilar wire. >> >> Cases 2) and 3) are RF uses. In the case of 2), the closely spaced wires >> form a near 50 ohm balanced transmission line depending on the gauge. When >> wound on a ferrite, the electric and magnetic fields only penetrate a >> fraction of a millimeter into the core and the velocity and impedance of >> the transmission line are altered by the relative dielectric constant and >> relative permeability of the material. In the case of 3), the use is to >> make broadband coupled transmission line transformers. You will typically >> find 3) in the cable TV splitters. >> >> It would seem that the only practical mode of use in a low frequency >> circuit is for case 1) - a high coupling primary-secondary 1:1 >> transformer. There is nothing about this that fundamentally is related to >> magnetocaloric excitation. >> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: >> >>> I do not understand the bifilar circuit, but Manelas really cared about >>> them. I provided $1500 worth of bifilar magnet wire at 20 and 22 gauge, >>> >>> Can anybody suggest the relation to either cooling or excess energy? >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:46 AM >>> *To:* vortex-l >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon >>> >>> From this VTA cookbook, the output coil was said to be a bifilar coil to >>> eliminate any magnetic influence from the output current. How would this >>> coil be setup, as show in the diagram below? >>> >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil >>> Bifilar coil - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> A bifilar coil is an electromagnetic coil that contains two closely >>> spaced, parallel windings. In engineering, the word bifilar describes wire >>> which is made of two ... >>> >>> >>> [image: Inline image 2] >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then. >>>> It is difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect >>>> phonons with magnons. >>>> >>>> >>>> I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my >>>> tenure as a Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA. I 1988 I was >>>> tasked to understand the new cuprate superconductors. By shear luck I >>>> discovered that MIT Professor Keith Johnson had solved the problem five >>>> years earlier. In fact, his 1983 paper presented in Zurich directed Bednors >>>> and Meuller to work on the cuprates. Bedorz was the leader of the >>>> conference in 1983. >>>> >>>> >>>> He found that the superconduction arises when the Born-Oppenheimer >>>> conditions are not met. That is, when the valence electron motion is >>>> coupled to vibrational modes. The electrons are in molecular orbitals and >>>> magnetism exists under very specific orbital topologies. >>>> >>>> >>>> So magnetism (Specific electron orbitals conditions) and phonons can be >>>> coupled under specific orbital conditions and one combination is shallow >>>> well ferromagnetism. Like the superconductor coupling, specific coupling >>>> can lead to coherent behavior as well in a ferromagnetic system. >>>> >>>> >>>> More needs tobe said but there is some new physics at work in the >>>> Manelas billet. >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* bobcook39...@gmail.com <bobcook39...@gmail.com> >>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 1:56 PM >>>> *To:* Chris Zell; vortex-l@eskimo.com >>>> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE >>>> >>>> >>>> Chris- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have understood that phonons are “virtual” particles that represent a >>>> localized energy in a crystal lattice made up of kinetic energy and >>>> potential energy in a resonant stable dynamic state. It is primarily >>>> thought to be an electric field that couples the nuclei and electrons in >>>> the lattice—primarily the valence electrons. The nuclei oscillate around >>>> some mid position in the lattice and valence electrons change their >>>> orbital spin states reflecting the motion of the nuclei. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Temperature of the crystal lattice is a measure of the amplitude of the >>>> nuclei special displacement around their mid position in the lattice. If >>>> the crystal constitutes a coherent QM system, then all nuclei vibrate with >>>> the same amplitude and the crystal is at a single temperature. If the >>>> amplitude (temperature) get to high, the crystal electronic bonds fail and >>>> the order of the crystalline coherent system is lost. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Magnetic fields change the nature of the potential/kinetic energy >>>> sharing. A preferred direction in the crystal is created relative to the >>>> magnetic B field that exists within the crystalline coherent system. The >>>> orbital spin energy states of the valence electrons are modified. Large B >>>> fields can cause large changes in these orbital spin states. If there are >>>> resonances between a nuclear orbital spin state of the coherent system and >>>> an electronic orbital spin state, it would seem possible that spin energy >>>> may be swapped, changing nuclear potential energy into PHONIC energy of >>>> the crystalline coherent system. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> A variable B field induced by a variable ambient H magnetic field will >>>> create a universe of differing spin energy states each with a small >>>> difference in it angular momentum. If total angular momentum can be >>>> conserved, IMHO A TRANSITION WILL OCCUR. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It may be also possible that the transition is reversible. In such >>>> case a reduction of the temperature—lower electron orbital energy—would be >>>> the result. (Such a reversal suggests a new concept of temperature, one >>>> which shares potential and kinetic energy between nuclear entities and >>>> electrons. ) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Bob Cook >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for >>>> Windows 10 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From: *Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com> >>>> *Sent: *Monday, February 20, 2017 9:35 AM >>>> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com >>>> *Subject: *RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I do recall Wingate Lambertson - a scientist/expert on cermet >>>> products. Odd semi-ceramic things he called “E-dams” that generated excess >>>> energy. I recall that he passed away before it could be fully developed. >>>> It all sounded like phonon derived energy. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] >>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 11:14 AM >>>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Chris Zell wrote: >>>> >>>> If I google “phonons as an energy source”, nothing in particular comes >>>> up. If we are identifying them as the likely source of excess energy >>>> within a barium/strontium ferrite structure, I would think that someone >>>> somewhere has thought about cohering them into useful energy. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> But if you google "Microelectromechanical systems" you will get 750,000 >>>> hits. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
