Frank, those vibrations could be inducing a 1 dimensional Luttinger Liquid
which becomes a 1 dimensional vibrating BEC.   That is my V1DLLBEC
hypothesis.
V1DLLBEC -- Vibrating 1 Dimensional Luttinger Liquid Bose Einstein
Condensate.

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Frank Znidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> wrote:

> From my book.  current revision.
>
> Low energy vibrations have a high energy effect at the scale
> of a condensed nano-domain. A universal dia-force-field,
> condition emerges as a consequence of the vibration. The
> dynamic magnetic fields (electromagnetic, gravitomagnetic,
> nuclear spin orbit, and weak) are driven to the surface of the
> particle. These magnetic forces, acting from a macroscopic
> surface, trigger the chemically assisted nuclear reactions.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Znidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Thu, Jun 8, 2017 9:46 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature
>
> Why is a Bose Condensate needed?  Its a matter of size and energy.  The
> smaller the size of something we want to see the more energy it takes.
> Using low energy radar you will never be able to read something as small as
> this text.  You need to go to UV energies to study atoms.  Higher ionizing
> energies are needed to study the nuclear forces.  Really high energy
> accelerator energies are required to look at subatomic particles.
>
> The common complaint physicists have with cold fusion is that the energy
> levels are to low to induce any type of nuclear reaction.  They never,
> however, considered the energy levels of a large hundreds of atoms wide
> condensed nano-particle.  Its energy levels are quite low.  Warm thermal
> vibrations appear to the nano particle as a high energy excitation.  This
> again is a matter of its size.  It's not cracks, or shrunken atoms at
> work.  It is the thermal excitation of a nano particle that yields the
> required energy.
>
> Again the simulation induces a velocity of one million meters per second.
>
> Frank Z
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to