There was a really good article in the Washington Post on Ivermectin which lays out the pros and cons of the drug and the controversy surrounding it. It comes down to people that are untrained buy veterinarian quality Ivermectin and overdosing the med. As Jed was saying the studies on it have questionable methodologies for testing on in the case of the largest study, it was retracted again due to questionable data manipulation. It really needs a large double blind study (just as all the other vaccines have gone through). It stands to make Merke (the big pharma that makes Ivermectin) a lot of money and you can be sure they want it on the list of available covid treatments.
What is foolish is using Ivermectin as an excuse not to get the vax now in its current form. .Two doses, it's free, easy to get, very effective and it helps everyone by not consuming hospital resources and morgue space (seriously). You have to wonder if Obama care wasn't in place whether gitting covid wouldn't qualify you to have a pre-existing condition? On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 9:34 AM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: > Jonathan Berry wrote: I have long studied repressed Cancer cures but never > knew of Ivermectin. > > > There are some key dates in Big pharma history. > > > Until about 1970 everybody got his yearly worm cure. Basically > Praziquantel. Praziquantel is a key drug that e.g. fights chlonorchis > sinensis also call liver fluke. Most pancreas and bile cancer is caused by > this fellow, that you e.g. get if you eat not so well cocked shrimps from > far east (e.g. Vietnam). Also watercress is a known source. > > More important for the meat eaters are the nymphs of cow, pig tapeworms > that can invade any organ in your body. Most brain strokes and also tumors > are cause by these nice fellows. > > What happened around 1970?? The first chemo cure was introduced and in > parallel countries have been ordered to stop distribute Praziquantel. So > the main reason for a raising cancer rates is the deprivation of people > from live saving drugs. Other deprived drugs(in USA) are as simple > Apricot/plum kernels = vitamin K = meracapto cyanide = induces apoptosis of > malign cells (still free in Europe) > > Other famous anti cancer drugs are methadone (Heroin), Cannabis what in > part explains the war against drugs...and not allowing a regular sale... > > So big pharma is not about curing you. It's about making money with your > intentionally destroyed health. > > > Regarding Ivermectin: There is a parallel drug called Nitazoxanide that is > even more hidden than Ivermectin. Guess why? > > You cannot outplay Ivermectin: Why: A virus is dead and thus needs the > living cell for replication. So if a drug stop this inside a cell then a > virus action cannot unfold. > > Uttar Pradesh (and most India) states are successful because the use > Ivermectin as a prophylaxis! > > J.W. > > > On 11.09.2021 04:28, Jonathan Berry wrote: > > Well think about it, they are going to be exposed to it too. > They need an effective cheap safe antidote. > > There are a LOT of suppressed cures for Cancer, including guess what, > Ivermectin! > > I have long studied repressed Cancer cures but never knew of Ivermectin. > > My point is is one of the biggest most feared killers has many many cures > and treatments more effective than Chemo, radiation and surgery but most > don't know about them because "they" control the official narrative and > only a small percentage of people aren't' too trusting and brainwashed... > > Then why should they fear that it will become overwhelmingly popular with > COVID? > > Though they are scared that it will be realized, look at how many have > fallen for this stupid experimental gene therapy mascerading as a Vaccine? > > > > > On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 11:02, Robin <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> > wrote: > >> In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:21:19 +0200: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >> Hypothetically - a bio-warfare designed virus, might be created with a >> cheap and commonly available "off switch" such as >> Ivermectin?? >> >> >> >On 10.09.2021 22:09, Jed Rothwell wrote: >> >> >> >> As I said, if ivermectin could have this effect, this would be clear >> >> from the double-blind clinical testing. >> > >> > >> >If Jed would once read a paper and not just spread, what his FM buddies >> >forward him, then he could see that it works! >> > >> >I sent the link some mails ago. >> > >> > >> >https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 OF course >> >big pharma never references it.... >> > >> >Virus gone after two,days. PCR confirmed. Not so in placebo arm... >> > >> >J.W. >> > >> >PS: Only blind mice eat poison... >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> >> >> -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
