Andrew,
I could give you a very long list. First problem: The Dirac equation
itself is only working for fields and never for mass. The inclusion of
the relativistic mass simply is an error made by a mathematician with no
clue of physics.
The Einstein equation (E=mc^2) has been guessed from the Poincaré
equation dm= E/c^2 . But Einstein did misunderstand this (Poincaré)
conclusion as it only works for radiation fields not for static fields.
So the Einstein and later the Dirac equation are plain nonsense. There
are other more severe reasons why the Einstein equation fails. I'm just
finishing a paper about this.
The other problem with deep orbits is the missing force equation that
should define the limit of such an orbit. Further a bound electron is
neutral and behaves as EM mass = waves. So beyond the Bohr radius you
cannot use the Coulomb formula as an orbit equivalent.
Real physics is not defined by mathematical fantasies. Look at SOP
(SO(4) physics). There is show the simple (all 10 digits exact) solution
for the e-p basic orbit energy. I also show the nature and exact energy
of the H*-H* p-p bond. All this is based on magnetic mass resonance
energies.
Initially I too liked the idea of deep orbits, but then I did understand
that charge/Coulomb is just a secondary effect of magnetic mass and a
basic solution can never be based on it.
J.W.
On 25.04.2022 16:02, Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
Jurg,
I would be interested in what physical laws you think are violated by
the deep-orbit electrons. Without the Dirac equation's "anomalous
orbit" results, I don't think that we would have looked for the
relativistic effects that make the deep orbits (and nuclear forces?)
possible.
Andrew
_ _ _
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 6:18 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote:
I just want to remind some folks here that H*-H*, the only
existing from of dense hydrogen (besides D*-D*) has been measured
by multiple methods by Randal Mills, now some 3 years ago. Also
Holmlid tried to measure the H*H* bond energy but he did work with
clusters of H* that suffer from multiple bonds.
The deep orbit models from Vavra, Meulenberg or others are just
mathematical fantasies, that violate basic physical laws. It's not
mathematics e.g. the Dirac equation that defines physics - its the
other way round physics defines the math that must fit.
So if you are interested in real physics check out R.Mills paper
or Holmlid.
(R.MILLS, Brilliant Light Power Shareholder_Meeting_040319 ;
BRLP_Analytical_Presentation_060419.pdf, R.Mills, p.108)
J.W.
On 23.04.2022 21:22, Jones Beene wrote:
On the possibility of "dense helium" - shall we call it the
"alpharino" ?
Helium, unlike hydrogen, will not diffuse through metals - so
long as the metal is nonporous. The first step in densification
is (probably) diffusion... but that problem may not be the
end-of-story.
Raney nickel for instance is porous enough to pass helium and is
also is catalytic - as in the hydrino world of Randell Mills and
his Rydberg values. If Va'vra is right about helium shrinkage
then a few possibilities are opened up in the search for how that
feat can be accomplished.
An interesting experiment would simply look for anomalous heat as
helium is pumped through a Raney nickel membrane.
HLV wrote:
A simple argument that small hydrogen may exist
Physics Letters B Volume 794, 10 July 2019, Pages 130-134
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624
Thanks for posting this. One curious observation is that
there are a few other atoms besides hydrogen which may
'densify' : Presumably the dense version would provide
anomalous heat.
Quote "Our calculation also shows that other fully ionized
“small-/Z/atoms” can form small-radius atoms... This would
create atoms, where one electron is trapped on a small
radius, effectively shielding one proton charge of the
nucleus,.."
Comment/question: Doesn't this finding open up the
possibility for extracting anomalous heat from Helium?
There could be secondary advantages to using Helium over H -
due to inertness leading to ability to reuse the gas over and
over ...
Is there any indication of a catalyst for forming dense helium ??
I don't know, but I have begun to wonder if frigorific radiation
could play a role in forming such atoms.
Also, for atoms below the ground state, I propose the term
depressed atom. This would compliment the term excited atom for
atoms above the ground state.
Harry
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
