Photons are the universal = most basic form of energy. With photons you
can transport energy over any distance. So here the equivalence relation
E = mc^2 is obvious. Same for the Pointing power vector for a radiation
field.
But if you write E = mc^2 and e.g. m is 4-He then the equation simply is
wrong. E must be of photon type at the end. There is no way to evaluate
the equation physically, what means you cannot transfer 4-He into
photons. (This is claimed for solutions of the Dirac equation)But for
this purpose you first must add the fusions energy you did gain from 4
(p+e) --> 4-He. Even then you face the same problem one more time as
there is no way to transform a proton into photons. For this you need to
add an other 50 MeV/proton.
This makes clear that E = mc^2 is not an equation rather than an
equivalence relation. But in the Dirac equation you mix an equivalence
relation with an equation what is physical nonsense!
J.W.
On 25.04.2022 23:12, H LV wrote:
I think I have posted this before, but Einstein was also able to
derive E=mc^2 without recourse to his theory of special relativity.Max
Born presented this alternate derivation in his book Einstein's Theory
of Relativity. Here is the proof:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QmOS5X3GR95t1rjr-SJQGVHun2_vykE5jDOVYc18La8/edit?usp=sharing
Harry
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 3:23 PM Robin
<mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> wrote:
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022
16:25:49 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
If E=mc^2 is wrong, then perhaps you should write the major
nuclear powers, and explain to them why their bombs don't
work. ;)
>Andrew,
>
>
>I could give you a very long list. First problem: The Dirac equation
>itself is only working for fields and never for mass. The
inclusion of
>the relativistic mass simply is an error made by a mathematician
with no
>clue of physics.
>
>The Einstein equation (E=mc^2) has been guessed from the Poincaré
>equation dm= E/c^2 . But Einstein did misunderstand this (Poincaré)
>conclusion as it only works for radiation fields not for static
fields.
>So the Einstein and later the Dirac equation are plain nonsense.
There
>are other more severe reasons why the Einstein equation fails.
I'm just
>finishing a paper about this.
If no one clicked on ads companies would stop paying for them. :)
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
