The person in this video asserts that the Twin Towers were destroyed
on purpose, with explosives. As Ed Storms and I have pointed out
previously, hundreds of the world's best civil engineers examined the
videos and physical evidence from the Towers, such as the melted
steel. This was the most detailed, expensive and thorough engineering
investigation in history. All of them agreed that the airplanes alone
destroyed the structure. The notion that you could fool all of these
experts, or bribe or frighten them into hiding the truth, is
ludicrous. It is utterly impossible -- utterly absurd.
If you pay attention to cold fusion, you will see that one of the
most important lessons is: Experts are right. Electrochemists and
materials scientists know what they are doing, and when they say
there is excess heat, you should believe them. You should NOT
believe idiots who know nothing about the relevant science, such as
Robert Park in the case of cold fusion, or the economist in this
video. This guy actually said, in the beginning of the video, that
when he saw the initial images on television he was "sure those
building would not fall." Compare that to the reaction of every
qualified engineering expert in the world who saw the videos. They
all knew that it was just a matter of time -- minutes or hours --
before the buildings collapsed. According to their later testimony,
the only thing that surprised most of them was how long the buildings
stood. As I mentioned here years ago, one of the British experts
tried to get through by phone to the New York Police to warn them to
evacuate, because -- he later told investigators -- he could tell at
a glance that the building would soon fall.
Also, John Berry's assertion that no aircraft crashed in
Pennsylvania, and that aircraft leave a large hole in the ground is
preposterous. I know a thing or two about crashed airplanes. I have
seen many photos of them, plus two small fatal air crashes here at
the Peachtree Dekalb airport. They caused no more damage to the
surroundings than a car crash. My father visited Stalingrad and other
Russian battlefields, and saw the remains of large aircraft that
crashed plus lots of other destroyed equipment and holes in the
ground -- the worst mayhem in history. He did not see (and you will
not see in the photos of the battle) giant holes in the ground,
except from artillery. Even the largest modern aircraft accidents
seldom make large holes. Airplanes are light, low density aluminum
vehicles. There is a test facility next to my office where people
crush and destroy aircraft wings and fuselages, and they leave a
large pile of wrecked equipment behind the building. I have seen
people over there carry around smashed wing sections larger than
themselves, and in air crashes the fragments are seldom as large as
people (and what is left of the people on board is seldom larger than
a breadbox). When aircraft strike the ground or a concrete wall, they
shatter into many small pieces. It is not like a cartoon, where they
make a single large hole in the shape of an airplane. Also, as with
the Towers, there were thousand of witnesses and rescue workers, and
if there had not been a smashed airplane on the ground in
Pennsylvania, that secret would be impossible to cover up.
- Jed
- Re: [Vo]: OT: Whoa, Fido.... Jed Rothwell
-
