On 1/11/2007 2:13 PM, William Beaty wrote: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, John Berry wrote: > >> Seriously, the 'evidence' against him > > Read my message again. WHAT EVIDENCE AGAINST HIM? I'm *trying* to > explain why he got a chilly reception here. > >> is some vague sense you get at the way >> get gets mad doesn't 'feel' right? > > Exactly. But not "vague" at all. His very specific behaviors led me to > automatically distrust him and switch into "scammer-defense mode." > > As for replication, I'll sit this one out myself. Ron's experiment is an > example of a typical FE experiment failure: a high frequency device where > the "success" is based on estimates of input/output power. (Though nobody > has measured the input and output power.) > > Also, has someone replicated Ron's closed loop device, the stand-alone-no- > signal-generator version which lights LEDs? If so, which message > announces this success?
The wave _forms_ (rather than the power) from the signal generator may be indispensible. If that is so then a closed loop (with an earth ground) would require the signal generator to be part of the loop. Harry
