On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, John Berry wrote: > Seriously, the 'evidence' against him
Read my message again. WHAT EVIDENCE AGAINST HIM? I'm *trying* to explain why he got a chilly reception here. > is some vague sense you get at the way > get gets mad doesn't 'feel' right? Exactly. But not "vague" at all. His very specific behaviors led me to automatically distrust him and switch into "scammer-defense mode." As for replication, I'll sit this one out myself. Ron's experiment is an example of a typical FE experiment failure: a high frequency device where the "success" is based on estimates of input/output power. (Though nobody has measured the input and output power.) Also, has someone replicated Ron's closed loop device, the stand-alone-no- signal-generator version which lights LEDs? If so, which message announces this success? (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb at amasci com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 425-222-5066 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci
