Jones,
We can only hope to get honorable mention at best; I am not worried
about reputation or remuneration other than savings due to free energy. I am
resigned to let the mainstream take the ball and run with it, Without a big
name to command respect ZPF will be forever shouted down - I am still answering
critics that throw Parks 1991 comments at me and absolutely insist on centering
the arguments around Mills sub ground state like all the other players and
theories don't even exist. They stop just short of name calling. Why Mills
evokes such hatred is beyond me but I have to go out of my way every time I
mention his results to say the sub ground state was a wrong interpretation or
I immediately get nasty comments. Its' like waving a red flag! His mistake
wasn't really all that big or surprising given the data he was observing and
the date of his research, It was before the Italians had even introduced the
idea that an equivalence could exist in a Casimir cavity or that a Casimir
cavity and catalyst might be related, Anybody would have assumed from the
equations that the radius must be changing because things like time and planks
constant can only change relativistically and there wasn't sure any event
horizon around .
Best Regards
Fran
________________________________
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:28 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The cost of materials is not a barrier
Fran,
You might be interested in this alternative or reinforcing explanation for
finding a gateway to "free energy" from the mainstream copycats and plagiarists
at PhysOrg.com
"Could Exotic Matter Provide an Infinite Source of Energy?"
September 15th, 2009 By Lisa Zyga
The best thing about this piece is a cool image which is the cover of the
October 1920 issue of Popular Science magazine, painted by Norman Rockwell -
depicting an inventor working on a perpetual motion machine.
(PhysOrg.com) -- Generally, scientists prefer to avoid the concept of perpetual
motion. The idea of a machine that could produce movement that goes on forever,
and using that movement to generate an endless stream of energy, is usually
considered more science fiction than science.
But recently, physicist Pavel Ivanov has investigated previous speculation that
an exotic fluid with unusual properties could cause energy to flow continuously
between different regions of space, resulting in a runaway transfer of energy.
If an advanced civilization were able to construct a device to capture this
energy, it might finally possess its own "perpetuum mobile" -- or perpetual
motion.
Ivanov, from both the University of Cambridge and the Lebedev Physical
Institute in Moscow, has analyzed this possibility in a study accepted to
Physics Letters B. The idea is that a one-dimensional exotic fluid, whose
unique properties such as violating the weak energy condition in particle
physics, leads to a scenario in which there is a light cone with regions of
negative and positive total energies.
Ivanov has calculated the equations of state which give a continuous energy
transfer from the negative regions to the positive regions, resulting in what
he calls "perpetuum mobile of the third kind." However, Ivanov conjectures that
theories "plagued" by solutions involving continuous energy flows should be
discarded as inherently unstable.
END of quoted material
My comment is that this "negative region of space" sounds all too much like
Dirac's sea of negative energy, for it not to be called that from the git-go,
and furthermore, this is all too similar to ZPE theories which are out there.
This could all be a thinly disguised ploy by the "Ivory Tower" late-comers to
try to usurp some of the prior art of us perp-mo's and assorted vorticians -
now that we are on the verge of demonstrating something that they have been
trying to convince the public is impossible.
Shame on them ;-)
From: Roarty, Francis X
Jones,
I don't believe in the hydrino definition regarding fractional ground
states but Yes I do think "fast" or "relativistic" hydrogen is involved at a
fundamental level in all of LENR. Below is a snip from Wikipedia on Balmer
series visible light spectrum from hydrogen. I suspect the gradient of the
equivalence boundary as suggested by Di Fiore et all is shifting the visible
spectrum in the same way vacuum fluctuations are supposed to be upconverted. If
you can accept that upconversion is relativistic and not just displacing long
flux in favor of short then space time itself twists inside the cavity taking
EVERY spectrum with it from our perspective. Why darker visible instead of
lighter is beyond my skill set but perhaps there is a sub visible line that
becomes dominant and exhibits itself as Black Light plasma?
Best Regards
Fran
[Snip from Wikipedia]
The visible spectrum of light from hydrogen displays four wavelengths, 410 nm,
434 nm, 486 nm, and 656 nm, that reflect emissions of photons by electrons in
excited states transitioning to the quantum level described by the principal
quantum number n equals 2.[1] There are also a number of ultraviolet Balmer
lines with wavelengths shorter than 400 nm.
[end snip]
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:08 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The cost of materials is not a barrier
The big surprise, if one believes that a version of the Mills
hydrino/deuterino is involved at a fundamental level in all of LENR, would
be the appearance of EUV.
Unfortunately this radiation spectrum is "universally absorbed" by every
element in the periodic table, so you would need to somehow incorporate the
detector into the electrode itself.
Mills uses a pinhole detector.
-----Original Message-----
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
If we are looking at an active surface, what will we see in the
visible and near-IR?
