Robin wrote: > In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:12:49 -0700: > Hi, > [snip] > >I am certain > >that this means that the copper CANNOT be the result of a nuclear process. > > ..it could be if Rossi enhanced the Ni62/64 isotopes as he claims to have done. > (however I must admit that I find Rossi's claim a bit far fetched.) > hmmm...If the copper results from migration rather than from transmutation the contents of the reactor would weigh relatively more than you would expect from transmutation. Harry
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wrong? Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wrong? Jed Rothwell
- RE: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wrong? Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wrong? Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wrong? Jed Rothwell
- RE: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wrong? Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wr... Jed Rothwell
- RE: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wr... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wr... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wr... mixent
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wr... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wr... mixent
- Re: [Vo]:The 12.4 kW claims of january 14 wr... Jed Rothwell