Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Ø but if it turns out the copper has natural isotopes and yet it is a > transmutation product . . . that will be a fact, and you will be wrong. > > > > Riiiiight … and if frogs grow wings they will not bump their butts on every > leap. > > > > Do you realize how silly you are sounding on every incremental try - with > this nonsense? > I know how improbable this is. I know it just as well as you do. So do E&K. However, unlike you, we will wait to see what the data reveals. No matter how improbable it may seem, it cannot be 100% ruled out by theory, only by experiment. You say that's nonsense but people such as Kullander and I call it science. We are not idiots or senile; we just have a different world-view than you do. I do not understand why this upsets you so much, or why you call people names because of it. - Jed