Galantini's observations are of little consequence if he did not observe the
very forceful flow of steam out of the E-Cat that would be necessary to
correlate with numbers Rossi gives for heat production. No such
observations have been made wrt the vidoes presented. In fact, the
emanations look extraordinarily weak.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Multiplying entities: why would Rossi fake some tests when
others are indisputably real?
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
I guess, you missed my point. When Galantini observed ictu oculi, the
E-Cat was not yet overflowing, because it may take several tens of
minutes if not hours before water level rises enough to start
overflowing . .
Ah. I see what you mean. However, he says he checked several times. So we
can be sure that during the times he did check, it was not overflowing. It
was also producing excess heat during those times. So if it produces real
excess heat when it is not overflowing, there is no reason to think it
would not produce heat even if it did, later, overflow, or during a
flowing water test.
I do not think it overflows, but even if it does, that does not preclude
real heat. I suppose it would reduce the amount of heat, as Abd says. It
would also prevent steam from coming out of the end of the hose, as Storms
says. Therefore I doubt it is happening.
- Jed
