On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de> wrote: > Am 13.11.2011 01:47, schrieb Berke Durak: >> Even if only water flowed through the pipe, and even if we assume >> that its temperature was actually only 100 degrees, then at least >> 1.17 GJ of energy would be required. The input energy was only 238 >> MJ. > > If we assume only a small amount was vaporized and the major amount > of water was neither heated nor vaporized and flew back through the > second pipe, then excess energy is not required.
So you say no water was heated now? Do you have any basis for that assumption? How did Fiovaranti get the 104.5 degrees reading then? Did Rossi hide heaters in the pipe?!? With that kind of assumption, one can dismiss even the most careful demonstration. If we stick to the report, then 3716 liters of H2O went into the reactor at 18.3 degrees and came out through the lower steam pipe at 104.5 degrees. The report also states that 66 kWh of energy was used (from the diesel generator). Even with extremely unfavorable assumptions, that requires, at minimum, hundreds of megajoules of excess energy. -- Berke Durak
