I do not think anyone could say that it is not possible to make a sophisticated scam of an ECAT. Rossi has helped the skeptical among us by allowing this to be the case. Do you honestly think that he is not aware of this possibility? Why 1 core? Why the relatively short test? All of these issues point to a planned attempt to misdirect. He has his reasons and I am not sure that we will ever find out why.
Like I have said before, his 1 MW system was his real attempt to dazzle us. The skeptics among us have conveniently disregarded the results of this test for their reasons. I am a bit unhappy with the fact that he did not give us good data to work with following this test, but he might be honest about the reason. It will not be long before the truth will come out about Rossi's system. Many of us think it is the real thing. The others should be praying that it is. I guess I should modify my last sentence. Some others hope that the ECAT is a scam, especially those who make a living based upon industries that will be replaced. I think it is a moral issue to give support to people like Rossi who can really make a large positive impact upon the world. Where do you stand? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Nov 17, 2011 4:39 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convincing On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:29 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: It is clear to me that Rossi does not want it to be easy to determine. At least, in that, he succeeds. But, the results of this test speak for themselves. But like you just said, they don't speak clearly. Actually, none of the results require nuclear reactions to explain them. I fail to believe that so many important people are in a scam with Rossi. It is just not credible to me. I doubt that anyone other than Rossi is involved in a scam (maybe his wife). Most of the others demonstrated that they are not qualified to evaluate the tests by their failure to understand steam. And who cares about the credibility of the scam. The issue is the credibility of the experiment, which is not. The Ni-H system is the one we have been waiting for. It will make history. I fail to understand why you think a believer's statement like this will have any influence on people skeptical of the claims for technical reasons. It is just not credible to me.
