To avoid being laughed at and eventually fired, the people at NASA need a politically correct theory to legitimate their interest in cold fusion.
High energy and plasma physics and its conceptual spawn, the standard model all say that the coulomb barrier is inviolate. So how can NASA embrace the possibility of cold fusion and still be on the right side of standard science? Well, just place credence and lip service into a “weak force” based theoretical alternative to cover their interest and their butt ends in a plausible conceptual framework. Let us hope that NASA does not become myopic and self-delusional in their blind adherence to this theory. The best course for them would be to develop diagnostic tools in an open minded quest to see what is really happening on the surface of the nickel lattice. On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Akira Shirakawa <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hello group, > > This is via ecatnews [1] / NASA Langley RC YouTube Channel [2] > > Joe Zawodny informally speaks again about his group's recent developments > on LENR and future applications/implications. Widom-Larsen theory cited, > new very small scale test device shown. > > This video appears to have been uploaded yesterday. Enjoy: > > NASA LaRC | Abundant Clean/Green Energy > http://youtu.be/42hrCRx1JJY > > Cheers, > S.A. > > > [1] http://ecatnews.com/?p=2212 > [2] > http://www.youtube.com/user/**NASAinnovation?feature=watch<http://www.youtube.com/user/NASAinnovation?feature=watch> > >
