LeClair has observed the generation of *Protonated Water Clusters* in the plasma of the collapsing cavitation bubble. This nanomaterial is a topologic material that concentrates positive charges; most probably superconductive and quantum mechanically coherent at the tip of the cluster.
It is this charge concentration that reduces or cancels the coulomb barrier. See *The following doctoral thesis characterizes **Protonated Water Clusters. These clusters are formed around positive ions. * * * *http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/28349/1/gupea_2077_28349_1.pdf*<http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/28349/1/gupea_2077_28349_1.pdf> ** * * *Thermal properties of clusters and molecules* * * *- Experiments on evaporation, thermionic emission, and radiative cooling* * * *E**RIKA **S**UNDÉN* * * *Department of Physics* *University of Gothenburg* * * With the strength of the coulomb barrier greatly lowered or completely down, the energy of the bow shock wave only needs to be equal to or greater than the endothermic energy levels needed to transmit elements over the atomic number of iron. Storms is correct in his observation that the nuclear fusion process is “novel and unexpected”. The neutron production levels needed to transmute trans-iron elements is not produced since LeClear is still alive after exposure to his reaction. This proton based type of transmutation has been seen in exploding foil experiments and is a LENR reaction. There is a good chance that the LeClair effect has been seen before is these exploding foil experiments conducted in water. The electric spark would have produced a collapsing cavitation bubble identical to that seen in the LeClair experiment. http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-333/aflb333m645.pdf On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> http://pesn.com/2012/04/28/9602083_NanoSpire_Inc_on_Harnessing_Cavitation_Zero_Point_Energy_to_Produce_Fusion_and_Transmutation_in_Water/ >> >> >> >> the pictures from LeClair are in the comments section of this blog. >> > > Thanks. Not many photos there. Only one, it seems. I do not know what to > make of it. Ed Storms is quoted: > > I examined the material sent by NanoSpire and saw nothing unusual. I have > no reason to doubt the experience they claim, but I have no reason to > believe it either. As for the theory, it makes no sense based on my > understanding of science. > > That is sensible. > > - Jed > >