Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of knowledge
local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed particle I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a > distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force > than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling > at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid > escape from the earth as it orbits through the earth. It also explains why > this "Kepler orbit" of the gremlin is locked to the rotation of the earth > so as to keep the geographic intersection points to the surface of the > earth effects more or less constant. No other orbital system but > geostationary orbit is so locked to the rotation of the earth because those > orbits are more than 10^-17m from earth and therefore cannot enjoy the > sizzling juicy smoked flavor, dare I say "charm" of hamburger that has > benefitted from helpers such fermionic fiesta cheese sauce. > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Weak interactions are most noticeable when particles undergo beta >> decay<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay>, >> and in the production of deuterium and then helium from hydrogen that >> powers the sun's thermonuclear process. At the center of every Sun and >> planet is dark matter. The only difference between a Sun and a planet is >> the size and gravitational pull of the dark matter nucleus. A sun's pull >> is great enough to initiate Nuclear Fusion on a grand scale. The gas >> giants in our solar system all have a dark matter nucleus/LENR reactor at >> their center creating Hydrogen, Helium and Deuterium, etc. Mercury, Venus, >> Earth and Mars' reactor is tuckered out from ages of dark matter >> annihilation from being closer to the sun and getting pelted. >> >> Stewart >> darkmattersalot.com >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> *weakly interacting massive particles* or *WIMPs*, are particles >>> serving as one possible solution to the dark >>> matter<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter> problem. >>> These particles interact through the weak >>> force<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction> >>> and gravity <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity>, and possibly >>> through other interactions no stronger than the weak force. Because they do >>> not interact with electromagnetism they cannot be seen directly, and >>> because they do not interact with the strong nuclear >>> force<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction> they >>> do not react strongly with atomic nuclei. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> They weakly react via gravity, that is all they need. You can keep the >>>> hamburgers. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I still think you're barking up the wrong tree with this dark matter >>>>> stuff. Clearly, the only substance that can orbit the earth at a velocity >>>>> orders of magnitude above escape velocity, as you posit it must, is >>>>> hamburger. Why do I say this? Because in order to overcome the tendency >>>>> to take off on a hyperbolic trajectory, the substance must have a helper. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Axil, >>>>>> >>>>>> One thing I have noticed in my dark matter model for a particle is >>>>>> that when a dark matter nucleus is subject to more dense matter on one >>>>>> side >>>>>> of it (i.e. water), it converts the matter to energy and shoots it out >>>>>> the >>>>>> opposite side in order to have equilibrium on both sides, like a...comet >>>>>> nucleus does with it's ion tail. That bow/shock wave is also what I >>>>>> believe is leading to many massive fish/mammal kills underwater by these >>>>>> particles when they are orbiting around us and into the Earth. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lastly, there is a crazy guy on his blog saying that he solved the >>>>>> Bermuda Triangle mystery, something about orbiting weakly interacting >>>>>> massive particles, contrails and sucking in airplanes. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://darkmattersalot.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Stewart >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> “In LeClairs later experiment where there are score lines across the >>>>>>> surface of metal, I suspect that there is a second self sustaining >>>>>>> effect, >>>>>>> possibly involving bow waves and casimir forces, although I was not left >>>>>>> totally convinced by LeClair's casimir force explanation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Whatever it is, it seems that the presence of the metal/water >>>>>>> surface is important for this second effect to be self sustaining. It >>>>>>> appears that there is feedback which results in the projectile neither >>>>>>> burrowing into the metal or leaving the metal surface. I feel there is a >>>>>>> clue here somewhere” >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The self-sustaining structure that preserves the positive water >>>>>>> ionic crystal is a plasmoid. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A plasmoid is a coil of negative and positive electric currents that >>>>>>> form a ball with the positive ions on the inside and the negative >>>>>>> electrons >>>>>>> on the outside. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The plasmoid is self-sustaining as it converts LENR reaction energy >>>>>>> into electromagnetic current flow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The tendency of electrons to flow along the surface of a metal would >>>>>>> keep the plasmoid from penetrating the surface of the metal substrate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers: Axil >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Having discussed what he appears to have seen with Mark L, I ended >>>>>>>> up coming to the conclusion that there are possibly two separate >>>>>>>> effects >>>>>>>> that we may need to consider. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> First there is whatever it is that happens within the cavitation >>>>>>>> bubble that starts the process off. In situations where cavitation >>>>>>>> causes >>>>>>>> damage to nearby surfaces this is probably the only effect in town. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In LeClairs later experiment where there are score lines across the >>>>>>>> surface of metal, I suspect that there is a second self sustaining >>>>>>>> effect, >>>>>>>> possibly involving bow waves and casimir forces, although I was not >>>>>>>> left >>>>>>>> totally convinced by LeClair's casimir force explanation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Whatever it is, it seems that the presence of the metal/water >>>>>>>> surface is important for this second effect to be self sustaining. It >>>>>>>> appears that there is feedback which results in the projectile neither >>>>>>>> burrowing into the metal or leaving the metal surface. I feel there >>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>> clue here somewhere >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nigel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 11/11/2012 03:39, Axil Axil wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am interested in the possible association of >>>>>>>>> zero-point-energy/**electrostatic based supersonic shockwave >>>>>>>>> acceleration >>>>>>>>> processes that occur as a consequence of ionic crystal formation >>>>>>>>> during >>>>>>>>> cavatation bubble collapse and the closely related plasma reaction >>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>> Papp engine which might occur in the plasmoid formation process in >>>>>>>>> heavy >>>>>>>>> noble gases. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Plasmoid that is formed by the spark discharge in a noble gas >>>>>>>>> mix might >>>>>>>>> be analogous to what happens in the collapse of a single large >>>>>>>>> cavatation >>>>>>>>> bubble. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Plasmoid both acts like and might be thought of as a >>>>>>>>> manifestation of a >>>>>>>>> single large collapsing cavitation bubble. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In more detail, what Mark LeClair has observed as positive ionic >>>>>>>>> crystallization formation in water that is catalyzed in the high >>>>>>>>> pressure >>>>>>>>> plasma generation during cavatation in water may also be happening >>>>>>>>> in ionic >>>>>>>>> positively charge krypton and xenon crystal formation in the Papp >>>>>>>>> reaction. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I believe that this idea is justifiable since cavatation damage >>>>>>>>> also occurs >>>>>>>>> in liquid sodium and molten salt pumps at levels of up to ten >>>>>>>>> times more >>>>>>>>> intense as is happening in water. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Positive ionic crystallization formation can happen in many types >>>>>>>>> of ionic >>>>>>>>> elements and chemical compounds in both liquids and gases. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here is a recent YouTube based interview covering cavitation with >>>>>>>>> Mark >>>>>>>>> LeClair. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=a7Gqd34R5OQ<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7Gqd34R5OQ> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In this interview, Mark LeClair believes that LENR happens in >>>>>>>>> cavatation. >>>>>>>>> But a deeper level of abstraction is needed in his thinking. LENR >>>>>>>>> actually is based on the action of positively charged ionic >>>>>>>>> super-atomic >>>>>>>>> crystals. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
