The other thing to note is the particle is in a decaying Earth orbit, not your silly ass Wolfram 1st grade example.
On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote: > I'm sorry, that answer is only a little better than "Its in the library > somewhere." > > You get an F. > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Read my blog > > > On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote: > > Pop quiz! > > Kepler is famous for having solved calculus derivation of minima and > maxima of a curve when presented with the challenge of finding the optimum > shape for a barrel of dill pickles to go with the tasty char broiled > hamburgers that history now recognizes as the inspiration for flavour in > physics. > > Kepler is also famous for having found the closed form solution to the two > body orbital problem where the mass and velocities of two co-orbiting > bodies is known. > > Given the mass of the earth and the purported orbital speed of the gremlin > of thousands of kilometers per second, what is the minimum mass of a > gremlin that can result in a maximal orbital velocity of just 1000 > kilometers per second? > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Notice Woflram does not show you the particle mass. Orbits depend on more > than just velocity. Also notice that the research does not place a lower > limit on mass: > > "If the WIMP is heavy even with optimistic assumptions and large exposures > it will only be possible to place a lower limit on its mass" > > Also notice that two body Kepler orbits do not necessarily orbit around > the center of mass of either object they orbit a barycenter, which may > place their orbit above and below the surface of matter that they weakly > interact with. > > Also notice that if a good portion of your orbit is through a mass that > you interact gravitationally with it will attempt to lock you in as opposed > to an orbiting satellite in space. Just like the moving ocean mass will > attempt to steer you gravitationally. > > Also notice that your hamburger just disappeared thru beta decay while you > were not watching and listening to me. > > Stewart > darkmattersalot.com > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My, Goodness! > > You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside > Earth > > http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/ > > And tell them to fix their units labeling. If one were a hamburger helper > physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s rather > than km/s! > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of > knowledge > > local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) > http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf > > fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed > particle > > I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for > you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations > that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and > cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a > distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force > than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling > at speeds orders of magnitude above escape > >
