My, Goodness! You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside Earth
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/ And tell them to fix their units labeling. If one were a hamburger helper physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s rather than km/s! On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of > knowledge > > local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) > http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf > > fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed > particle > > I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for > you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations > that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and > cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a >> distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force >> than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling >> at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid >> escape from the earth as it orbits through the earth. It also explains why >> this "Kepler orbit" of the gremlin is locked to the rotation of the earth >> so as to keep the geographic intersection points to the surface of the >> earth effects more or less constant. No other orbital system but >> geostationary orbit is so locked to the rotation of the earth because those >> orbits are more than 10^-17m from earth and therefore cannot enjoy the >> sizzling juicy smoked flavor, dare I say "charm" of hamburger that has >> benefitted from helpers such fermionic fiesta cheese sauce. >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Weak interactions are most noticeable when particles undergo beta >>> decay<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay>, >>> and in the production of deuterium and then helium from hydrogen that >>> powers the sun's thermonuclear process. At the center of every Sun and >>> planet is dark matter. The only difference between a Sun and a planet is >>> the size and gravitational pull of the dark matter nucleus. A sun's pull >>> is great enough to initiate Nuclear Fusion on a grand scale. The gas >>> giants in our solar system all have a dark matter nucleus/LENR reactor at >>> their center creating Hydrogen, Helium and Deuterium, etc. Mercury, Venus, >>> Earth and Mars' reactor is tuckered out from ages of dark matter >>> annihilation from being closer to the sun and getting pelted. >>> >>> Stewart >>> darkmattersalot.com >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> *weakly interacting massive particles* or *WIMPs*, are particles >>>> serving as one possible solution to the dark >>>> matter<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter> problem. >>>> These particles interact through the weak >>>> force<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction> >>>> and gravity <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity>, and possibly >>>> through other interactions no stronger than the weak force. Because they do >>>> not interact with electromagnetism they cannot be seen directly, and >>>> because they do not interact with the strong nuclear >>>> force<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction> they >>>> do not react strongly with atomic nuclei. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> They weakly react via gravity, that is all they need. You can keep >>>>> the hamburgers. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I still think you're barking up the wrong tree with this dark matter >>>>>> stuff. Clearly, the only substance that can orbit the earth at a >>>>>> velocity >>>>>> orders of magnitude above escape velocity, as you posit it must, is >>>>>> hamburger. Why do I say this? Because in order to overcome the tendency >>>>>> to take off on a hyperbolic trajectory, the substance must have a helper. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Axil, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One thing I have noticed in my dark matter model for a particle is >>>>>>> that when a dark matter nucleus is subject to more dense matter on one >>>>>>> side >>>>>>> of it (i.e. water), it converts the matter to energy and shoots it out >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> opposite side in order to have equilibrium on both sides, like a...comet >>>>>>> nucleus does with it's ion tail. That bow/shock wave is also what I >>>>>>> believe is leading to many massive fish/mammal kills underwater by these >>>>>>> particles when they are orbiting around us and into the Earth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lastly, there is a crazy guy on his blog saying that he solved the >>>>>>> Bermuda Triangle mystery, something about orbiting weakly interacting >>>>>>> massive particles, contrails and sucking in airplanes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://darkmattersalot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stewart >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> “In LeClairs later experiment where there are score lines across >>>>>>>> the surface of metal, I suspect that there is a second self sustaining >>>>>>>> effect, possibly involving bow waves and casimir forces, although I >>>>>>>> was not >>>>>>>> left totally convinced by LeClair's casimir force explanation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Whatever it is, it seems that the presence of the metal/water >>>>>>>> surface is important for this second effect to be self sustaining. It >>>>>>>> appears that there is feedback which results in the projectile neither >>>>>>>> burrowing into the metal or leaving the metal surface. I feel there is >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> clue here somewhere” >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The self-sustaining structure that preserves the positive water >>>>>>>> ionic crystal is a plasmoid. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A plasmoid is a coil of negative and positive electric currents >>>>>>>> that form a ball with the positive ions on the inside and the negative >>>>>>>> electrons on the outside. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The plasmoid is self-sustaining as it converts LENR reaction energy >>>>>>>> into electromagnetic current flow. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The tendency of electrons to flow along the surface of a metal >>>>>>>> would keep the plasmoid from penetrating the surface of the metal >>>>>>>> substrate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers: Axil >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Nigel Dyer >>>>>>>> <l...@thedyers.org.uk>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Having discussed what he appears to have seen with Mark L, I ended >>>>>>>>> up coming to the conclusion that there are possibly two separate >>>>>>>>> effects >>>>>>>>> that we may need to consider. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> First there is whatever it is that happens within the cavitation >>>>>>>>> bubble that starts the process off. In situations where cavitation >>>>>>>>> causes >>>>>>>>> damage to nearby surfaces this is probably the only effect in town. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In LeClairs later experiment where there are score lines across >>>>>>>>> the surface of metal, I suspect that there is a second self sustaining >>>>>>>>> effect, possibly involving bow waves and casimir forces, although I >>>>>>>>> was not >>>>>>>>> left totally convinced by LeClair's casimir force explanation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Whatever it is, it seems that the presence of the metal/water >>>>>>>>> surface is important for this second effect to be self sustaining. >>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>> appears that there is feedback which results in the projectile neither >>>>>>>>> burrowing into the metal or leaving the metal surface. I feel there >>>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>> clue here somewhere >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nigel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2012 03:39, Axil Axil wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am interested in the possible association of >>>>>>>>>> zero-point-energy/**electrostatic based supersonic shockwave >>>>>>>>>> acceleration >>>>>>>>>> processes that occur as a consequence of ionic crystal formation >>>>>>>>>> during >>>>>>>>>> cavatation bubble collapse and the closely related plasma >>>>>>>>>> reaction in the >>>>>>>>>> Papp engine which might occur in the plasmoid formation process >>>>>>>>>> in heavy >>>>>>>>>> noble gases. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Plasmoid that is formed by the spark discharge in a noble gas >>>>>>>>>> mix might >>>>>>>>>> be analogous to what happens in the collapse of a single large >>>>>>>>>> cavatation >>>>>>>>>> bubble. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Plasmoid both acts like and might be thought of as a >>>>>>>>>> manifestation of a >>>>>>>>>> single large collapsing cavitation bubble. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In more detail, what Mark LeClair has observed as positive ionic >>>>>>>>>> crystallization formation in water that is catalyzed in the high >>>>>>>>>> pressure >>>>>>>>>> plasma generation during cavatation in water may also be >>>>>>>>>> happening in ionic >>>>>>>>>> positively charge krypton and xenon crystal formation in the >>>>>>>>>> Papp reaction. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I believe that this idea is justifiable since cavatation damage >>>>>>>>>> also occurs >>>>>>>>>> in liquid sodium and molten salt pumps at levels of up to ten >>>>>>>>>> times more >>>>>>>>>> intense as is happening in water. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Positive ionic crystallization formation can happen in many types >>>>>>>>>> of ionic >>>>>>>>>> elements and chemical compounds in both liquids and gases. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Here is a recent YouTube based interview covering cavitation with >>>>>>>>>> Mark >>>>>>>>>> LeClair. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=a7Gqd34R5OQ<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7Gqd34R5OQ> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In this interview, Mark LeClair believes that LENR happens in >>>>>>>>>> cavatation. >>>>>>>>>> But a deeper level of abstraction is needed in his thinking. >>>>>>>>>> LENR >>>>>>>>>> actually is based on the action of positively charged ionic >>>>>>>>>> super-atomic >>>>>>>>>> crystals. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
