Dr. Storms: A short hand approach has to be used because neither one of us has the time to explain everything in detail. ***Can you please clarify whether you are using some kind of shorthand approach on the Nanocavities thread? Because formation of BECs using lasers to COOL the environment & removing energy from the system was how Dr. Chu got his Nobel Prize. It pointed to the possibility of BECs forming at higher temperatures, and now we have this evidence that BECs can form at room temperature.
On the Nanocavities thread, you wrote Re: [Vo]:nanocavities<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=subject:%22Re%3A+%5BVo%5D%3Ananocavities%22> Edmund Storms<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=from:%22Edmund+Storms%22>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:08:52 -0800<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=date:20130210> I don't understand your point. Laser stimulation has been done many times and it simply adds energy to the process. Energy can be added by increased temperature and application of applied current, which also increases the power. This changes nothing basic about the process nor reveals how the process works. Ed On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> >> > > Sorry, I thought I had made the point often enough that very little > radiation is detected that I got sloppy. The point is that large amounts > of energetic radiation are not detected. Yes, a little radiation is > detected that is energetic enough to get out of the apparatus. However, a > large amount of radiation would be created inside the apparatus. If you > read my papers, you would already know exactly what I claim. > > >> >
