correction: "Why are the UP-spin quarks on OPPOSITE sides of the nucleus from the DOWN-spin quarks???"
should be: Why are the UP-spin quarks on OPPOSITE sides of the PROTON from the DOWN-spin quarks??? -mark _____________________________________________ From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:19 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now! Jones: I don't think you're seeing the significance of my posting... I guess I didn't do a good job of expressing my point. WHY OPPOSITE???? Why are the UP-spin quarks on OPPOSITE sides of the nucleus from the DOWN-spin quarks??? [ I would propose that both are a dipole-like oscillation, just 180deg out of phase] Why do... "All spin directions collapse on one or the OPPOSITE direction depending on the measured photon polarization." ??? [this is the quote under one of the pics from the article] Why, in some nuclear interactions, do two gammas go shooting off in OPPOSITE directions???? Where is the physical model that explains the REASON why these observations involve OPPOSITEs???? Is antimatter everywhere (because it's simply the other HALF of the oscillation), but our measurement apparatus only detects one half of the oscillation and sees that as 'matter'? Why is the magnetic field PERPENDICULAR to the E-field??? It's all related... -Mark _____________________________________________ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 7:33 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now! Mark, Some of us only see a duck as a "downer" (cough, cough) Anyway, and from one fringe-of-the-fringe LENR perspective, this has "strong force interaction" written all over it, whether it is obvious to W-L proponents or not. RPF(reversible proton fusion) would certainly interact with its surrounds via spin (magnons) and would shuttle from one state (Helium-2) to another (two protons) with only quark interactions to show for the experience. The net energy deposited (or removed) is small per event, but happens at the rate of blackbody phonon vibration (mid terahertz). Thus even micro(eV) energy change per event can get amplified rapidly, if and when asymmetry is engineered into the reaction. ... hmmm... I'm now thinking of calling "quark color-change" as seen in RPF as the "quark-quack" reaction ... nothing there but spin, so to speak... thus giving detractors the satisfaction of calling the theory as quack-derived ... yet all the while, the other LENR theories are falling like ducks ... simply due to the obvious: not being able to adequately explain lack of gammas. In the end, it should be crystal clear to anyone who understands nuclear engineering - that there is no possible way to adequately explain the lack of gammas in LENR - other than that they never happened at all. Jones From: MarkI-ZeroPoint The evidence is piling up that subatomic 'particles' are dipole-like structures, and likely a type of dipole oscillation... Looks, sounds, feels and quacks just like one... ;-) HTSITYS, -Mark [darn pics made msg too large so had to delete the piccys] --------------------------- Researchers suggest one can affect an atom's spin by adjusting the way it is measured http://phys.org/news/2013-03-affect-atom-adjusting.html [GO to website to see picture]
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
