Dave stated:
". and that the energy from the reactions is shared among the atoms surrounding it. I have been looking for evidence that fusion can take place in the compact environment of a cold fusion NAE in a manner that is very different from that occurring within a plasma." When one looks at subatomic particles as dipolar oscillations, and within the NAE, all those oscillations being aligned and IN-PHASE, they will serve as energy sinks for a specific wavelength of energy. Thus, the amount of energy that would have been emitted in a gamma is distributed as smaller packets amongst the large number of IN-phase oscillators. This all reminds me of a PhysOrg article I mentioned a few years ago where the scientists had isolated two atoms, side by side, and cooled to near 0K. they could watch as one of the atoms remained completely still, while the other would wiggle, because it had a quantum of heat energy and thus, [my conclusion] the internal oscillators were out-of-balance, which causes the entire atom to 'shake'. What was interesting is that they could do something (don't remember what) that would cause that quantum of heat to xfer from the shaking atom to the still one and, you guessed it, the one that was still was now shaking and the former holder of the quantum of heat was now still. Back to Dave's statement. Does the gamma get emitted, but then immediately absorbed by the 'Collective' oscillations, or is it a direct xfer of quanta of energy as explained above? In either case, whatever the exact conditions that are required, it would seem that those conditions result in BOTH new low-energy nuclear processes AND an energy sink which (almost entirely) favors coupling into lattice vibrations instead of emission of energetic particles. -mark From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 8:07 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now! >In the end, it should be crystal clear to anyone who understands nuclear engineering - that there is no possible way to adequately explain the lack of gammas in LENR - other than that they never happened at all. I agree with you Jones. The only way to explain this process is to assume that the gammas are not emitted at any time and that the energy from the reactions is shared among the atoms surrounding it. I have been looking for evidence that fusion can take place in the compact environment of a cold fusion NAE in a manner that is very different from that occurring within a plasma. The system difference is evident and I have not seem papers describing known fusion events recorded within a metal matrix where gammas are emitted at the expected levels. I proposed an experiment where a palladium cube loaded with deuterium is subjected to a flux of muons as a way to induce conditions that are known to result in fusion. If this does not result in the release of a number of gammas, then evidence is obtained that fusion within a metal matrix is different than that occurring within a gas. Of course, muon induced fusion might behave differently than normal LENR activity. The more clues that we obtain about the behavior of LENR, the faster we can understand the mechanism. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, Apr 3, 2013 10:33 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now! Mark, Some of us only see a duck as a "downer" (cough, cough) Anyway, and from one fringe-of-the-fringe LENR perspective, this has "strong force interaction" written all over it, whether it is obvious to W-L proponents or not. RPF(reversible proton fusion) would certainly interact with its surrounds via spin (magnons) and would shuttle from one state (Helium-2) to another (two protons) with only quark interactions to show for the experience. The net energy deposited (or removed) is small per event, but happens at the rate of blackbody phonon vibration (mid terahertz). Thus even micro(eV) energy change per event can get amplified rapidly, if and when asymmetry is engineered into the reaction. ... hmmm... I'm now thinking of calling "quark color-change" as seen in RPF as the "quark-quack" reaction ... nothing there but spin, so to speak... thus giving detractors the satisfaction of calling the theory as quack-derived ... yet all the while, the other LENR theories are falling like ducks ... simply due to the obvious: not being able to adequately explain lack of gammas. In the end, it should be crystal clear to anyone who understands nuclear engineering - that there is no possible way to adequately explain the lack of gammas in LENR - other than that they never happened at all. Jones From: MarkI-ZeroPoint The evidence is piling up that subatomic 'particles' are dipole-like structures, and likely a type of dipole oscillation... Looks, sounds, feels and quacks just like one... ;-) HTSITYS, -Mark [darn pics made msg too large so had to delete the piccys] --------------------------- Researchers suggest one can affect an atom's spin by adjusting the way it is measured http://phys.org/news/2013-03-affect-atom-adjusting.html [GO to website to see picture]
