On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> interlab reproducibility is still a bitch. > > > ***True enough, but that doesn't make it a pathological science. It makes it a difficult one.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> interlab reproducibility is still a bitch. > > > ***True enough, but that doesn't make it a pathological science. It makes it a difficult one.