On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> interlab reproducibility is still a bitch. >> >> >> > ***True enough, but that doesn't make it a pathological science. It makes > it a difficult one. > Something is not made pathological. Poor interlab reproducibility is characteristic of pathological science.
