Of course it is erratic. The only question is: Is it erratic because
of random error or because the required conditions are not created
every time. We now know that certain critical conditions are
required, which are not created except by guided luck. So what? This
problem is typical of all new discoveries before they are mastered.
What is the usefulness of all this discussion. Cude will not accept
the most obvious and well supported arguments and he will not
accept what I just said here. He makes no effort to find common
ground or to add any insight to the discussion. In his mind, the CF
claims are only pseudoscience - end of discussion. Why not let him go
his way with this belief and discuss something useful because, as past
experiences demonstrated, there is no end to this process.
Ed
On May 8, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
wrote:
The results are not erratic.
Storms called cold fusion his reluctant mistress, and in an
interview with ruby carat (I think) he says the effect depends on
mother natures mood (I'm paraphrasing). Sounds erratic to me.
