On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:35 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
> It is apparent that Mr. Cude does not have a valid case and is not willing > to discuss the issues. We can show that every one of his positions is > nothing more than speculation with absolutely no substantiation. > > He refuses to acknowledge errors that he continues to present as fact when > he knows that they have no basis. ... > > The above cases and all the other so called evidence discussed by Cude > would not hold up in a court proceeding. > > So, instead of facing the issues head on, he prefers to spill out a > barrage of statements that are not true hoping that readers of this list > will not expect him to prove anything. > ***I'm noticing a pattern. > He is not being an honest skeptic, he is merely operating as a debunker of > LENR > ***Yup. He's simply more skillful than the average debunker. > and anyone that buys his arguments is being duped. LENR is far too > important for our future to allow people to play games for their > amusement. It is his hobby to debunk "cold fusion" which he has stated > openly. > > ***Yes, he has stated it openly. He also said he would be leaving Vortex. His word isn't worth what he would think, so Vorts will need to decide on the merits. Myself, I enjoy his Small-s skepticism when the sneering is removed, but his ability to do that seems limited. Much of that is because sometimes he's been shown to be simply wrong. And by wrong, I mean wrong by 4500 orders of magnitude, far less than impossible. Now, that's wrong. So I can see why he would need to resort to sneering and Big-s Skepticism. > >
