On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > What is the best thing about this new demonstration that it excludes > definitely steam based tricks from the possible repertoire. So from the > beginning it was all about the feeding extra input power via hidden wires. > Therefore most of the skeptics were just wrong, because they criticized > Rossi's demos on a base of steam quality. > Why should Rossi be restricted to one kind of deception? Change-up is the best way to avoid detection. Those steam cons had higher COP and higher power than this latest demo, and the steam was almost certainly very very wet. And note the input was simpler in those experiments. And it would have been trivially easy to eliminate the steam issue, by -- you know -- not making steam, like Levi did in the 18 your test. Ever wonder why that wasn't done under scrutiny?
