Jim,
Thanks, I was a vice president. You can run all of the financial numbers
you want but if that thing doesn't scale up based upon his "theory" they
don't work. Along with all of those large waterspouts, tornadoes and
hurricanes in nature there is a tremendous amount of condensing happening
at the location of strong jet streams.
His looks like a dust devil so far.
Stewart
On Wednesday, July 3, 2013, James Bowery wrote:
> Erratum: "1mil/W fixed operating cost" should read "10mil/W/year fixed
> operating cost"
>
> If you run these numbers with a 12% zero amortization levelization, the
> price per kWh comes to about 5mil/kWh delivered to the grid:
>
> (.30dollar*.12)/W/year+.01dollar/W/year?dollar/kWh
> ([{(0.3 * dollar) * 0.12} / watt] / year) + ([{0.01 * dollar} / watt] / year)
> ? dollar / (kilo*Wh)
> = 0.0052511416 dollar/kWh
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:35 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> See slide 19 of:
>>
>> http://vortexengine.ca/PPP/AVEtec_Business_Case.pdf
>>
>> Bottom line:
>>
>> If LENR doesn't pan out as an electrical generating system, Atmospheric
>> Vortex Engines are the next best thing.
>>
>> If LENR does pan out as an electrical generating system, Atmospheric
>> Vortex Engines are not only still hard to beat, at 300 mil/W capital cost,
>> 0 variable operating cost and 1mil/W fixed operating cost, but they can be
>> used with the larger centralized energy users (there will be _some_) to
>> relatively efficiently (up to 20%) cogenerate from the waste heat.
>>
>
>
