Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And you are jumping into conclusions that 3rd parties did not extensively > tested their reactors. > I did not say that. You are not reading what I said. On the contrary, I have said repeatedly that third parties have tested the reactors. I know that for a fact. As I said, I have spoken with several people who did tests. They are under NDA. They told me only that the results were inconclusive. Perhaps other people have seen conclusive positive results. I suppose it would be a good idea for Defkalion to publish these conclusive reports. They disagree with me. Perhaps they have good reasons for keeping a low profile. I do not second-guess a business decision when I know nothing about the circumstances. I have not seen any reports, inconclusive or positive, so I cannot judge whether these reports are valid or mistaken. You never can tell until you read the report. I have often read reports by experts that I considered mistaken. Defkalion cannot expect anyone to believe their claims with this policy. People who stick closely to the scientific method will suspend judgement and wait for proof. - Jed
