Maybe this is why Venus rotates so slowly while all the other planets that 
orbit the sun ccw rotate much faster. Rotation  being driven by a Tesla ether 
eating dynamic/whirlpool instead of opposing it.. all the other kids in the 
pool are in opposition to the direction Venus wants to make the pool whirl?
Fran

From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 7:51 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sun's 11-Year Cycle Caused by Dark Matter

There was almost no doubt that Stewart would jump onto this topic with a smile 
on his face - and there appears to be a pretty convincing cross-connection 
between sunspots and planetary tidal forces (not just Jupiter but others as 
well) locked into some kind of a cosmic slow dance, as he mentions on his site.

And the dark-matter input also sounds logical, due to the gammas. Yet the 
calculation of the intensity of tidal forces, as felt by the sun is miniscule - 
almost nothing, at least on paper as far as the gravitational component.

Thus - the problem is that these two phenomena taken together implies an 
extreme amplification factor or similar reactive connection between dark matter 
and gravity - intense focusing, as if small variation in gravity would magnify 
dark matter by a very large ratio.

How does that happen? That part does not seem to follow from the suspected 
properties of dark matter... and gravitational "lensing" requires galaxy-level 
mass, millions of solar mass, not a few puny planets.

Yet all of this does seem to fit into a hypothesis about gravitational 
polarization of the quantum vacuum which is by nature catalytic in the same way 
that a small magnet will align a large piece of iron.

http://phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html

... but, catch-22, and you may have noticed that if dark matter does not 
"really" exist but the phenomena attributed to dark matter are more easily 
explained by the gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum, then we 
simply call this effect "dark energy" instead :)

From: ChemE Stewart

Agreed, physicists are just a little slow...

http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/05/04/caught-in-the-quantum-crossfire/

Terry Blanton wrote:
https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/f61d3edfee30

Reply via email to