While people debate how small a hydrogen atom can be, there seems to be no
debate about how big a hydrogen atom can be.
Harry
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:06 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
> I guess that is what it boils down to Eric. I would much rather have the
> series continue indefinitely as I have been discussing. i.e.
> (1/2,1/3,...1/137,1/138...1/infinity) which would blend nicely with the
> other integer portion that we all assume is real. If the total series is
> found to be valid, then there is no special consideration needed for the
> 1/137 term.
>
> But, we must abide by natural laws and most times they do not care what we
> prefer. :(
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Sun, Jan 26, 2014 4:12 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills's theory
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:55 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> The theory is a photon like zitterbewegung model describing states that
>> retain locality in phase space with circular cycles of a trapped photon
>> representing the usual eigenstates. The Maxwell quanta hbar(c) becomes a
>> classical angular momentum quanta in phase space with quantum number 137
>> attached.
>>
>
> Ah, gotcha. Thank you. Hence also the electron "becoming a photon" as
> it approaches the lowest level.
>
> Now we have to decide whether we can live with a series { 1/2, 1/3, 1/4,
> ..., 1/136, alpha(N) }. (Or something like that.)
>
> Eric
>
>
