I believe you are underestimating the value of a small and efficient LENR device. I spoke with Mitchell about this on the bus at ICCF-18. I believe small is beautiful and I have a perfect application. Today 2-way public safety radios use lithium batteries that only work to about -10C, but the radio electronics are qualified to -40C. It is entirely plausible to use a NANOR as an efficient way to keep the portable lithium battery warm when the ambient temperature is below -5C. If he can make the NANORs repeatably and operate them in optimum COP with a small uC, that could well be the first LENR device to make it to market. Having a shipping product inside another product is a sure track to a device patent. This could be the finger removed from the dike.
Bob Higgins On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > Swartz is credible! However, such a small effect is not a credible support > for investment in a working devoice. I did not make this clear. I hope it > is clear now. If Swartz supplies devices that survive testing, this would > be useful to basic research but not to a development study. My point is > that we need emphasis placed on basic research. > > Ed Storms > >
