What I want to see is this thing hooked up to a minature sized sterling engine
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>wrote: > I believe you are underestimating the value of a small and efficient LENR > device. I spoke with Mitchell about this on the bus at ICCF-18. I believe > small is beautiful and I have a perfect application. Today 2-way public > safety radios use lithium batteries that only work to about -10C, but the > radio electronics are qualified to -40C. It is entirely plausible to use a > NANOR as an efficient way to keep the portable lithium battery warm when > the ambient temperature is below -5C. If he can make the NANORs repeatably > and operate them in optimum COP with a small uC, that could well be the > first LENR device to make it to market. Having a shipping product inside > another product is a sure track to a device patent. This could be the > finger removed from the dike. > > Bob Higgins > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> Swartz is credible! However, such a small effect is not a credible >> support for investment in a working devoice. I did not make this clear. I >> hope it is clear now. If Swartz supplies devices that survive testing, >> this would be useful to basic research but not to a development study. My >> point is that we need emphasis placed on basic research. >> >> Ed Storms >> >>
