Blaze--Bob here--

If you follow Rossi's blog, he has already considered the potential of Sterling 
engines.  I agree with Bob Higgins that small is not bad.  I could use one in 
my off-grid home in Alaska.  Even a small thermo-electric device hooked to the 
NANOR  would be useful.

Bob

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Blaze Spinnaker 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:21 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%


  http://bettigue.blogspot.de/



  This guy has very cool stirling engines.  I wonder how much heat energy you 
need to run these, though perhaps they could be optimized for a Nanor device.



  On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

    What I want to see is this thing hooked up to a minature sized sterling 
engine




    On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

      I believe you are underestimating the value of a small and efficient LENR 
device.  I spoke with Mitchell about this on the bus at ICCF-18.  I believe 
small is beautiful and I have a perfect application.  Today 2-way public safety 
radios use lithium batteries that only work to about -10C, but the radio 
electronics are qualified to -40C. It is entirely plausible to use a NANOR as 
an efficient way to keep the portable lithium battery warm when the ambient 
temperature is below -5C.  If he can make the NANORs repeatably and operate 
them in optimum COP with a small uC, that could well be the first LENR device 
to make it to market.  Having a shipping product inside another product is a 
sure track to a device patent.  This could be the finger removed from the dike.


      Bob Higgins





      On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> 
wrote:

        Swartz is credible! However, such a small effect is not a credible 
support for investment in a working devoice. I did not make this clear. I hope 
it is clear now.  If Swartz supplies devices that survive testing, this would 
be useful to basic research but not to a development study.  My point is that 
we need emphasis placed on basic research. 


        Ed Storms






Reply via email to