2014-02-28 19:07 GMT+01:00 Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>: > approach
thanks for the advice. I asked you that, not only for my personal curiosity (anyway I took my distance with theories), but because businessmen I know ask me opinion on researchers and their theories... My main message it to be very careful, to flee theory, and not trust NASA&al trust in WL, nor any theoretician until the lab guys agree... Your points convinced me, and I take them as you say. I don't feel any mechanism can be so efficient as to screen neutrons and gamma at 1-10^-6... Anyway you mostly add constraints, and give no answer... I like it... ;-) Really theory of LENR is a hell... problem is theory is important for engineers, and required for... insurers (key actors in LENR). I hope the irrational love of some theoretician for their theory won't block research work ... my feeling is that LENR was damned by theory... because most physicist could not find a theory they imagined it was artifact or fraud. and for those who accepted the experiments, since they could not find a theory in classical QM, they invented new physics... Hard for modern minds to admit ignorance, and admit only negative knowledge (what it cannot be). best regards.
