100 megawatts per cm^2 is only 10^8 watts per Cm^2. I have seen in research papers and have posted about 10^15 watts per cm^2 maximum seen in nanoplasmonic research.
I suspect that 10^20 watts per cm^2 is produced inside the Ni/H reactor because of the optimized nanoparticle configurations used. This will produce a magnetic field at 10^16 tesla. On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > *From:* Bob Cook > > > > Well the Chinese paper answers your recent question about what type of > radiation is produced in the SPP phenomena. > > > > Whoa. SPP can produce a radiation power density 100 megawatts per cm^2? Is > that a typo? > > > > That is quite a shock, in more ways than one ...<g> even if the authors had > somehow missed it by a factor of 100... the only question we should be asking > ourselves is: why isn't everyone in LENR jumping on implementing SPP into > their experiments ? > > > > Perhaps the reputation of the Terahertz Research Center, School of > Physical Electronics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of > China is not considered by some to be credible? > > > > No... methinks the core problem is plain old inertia and smugness... of the > First World variety... > > > > BTW - in terms of education, most of the authors of this paper were > probably educated here. The State Dept says that of the 1,777 physics > doctorates awarded in 2011, a typical year, over a third 743 went to > temporary visa holders - most of whom come from Asia. That should come as > no surprise to anyone walking around the top University physics departments. > > > *From:* MarkI-ZeroPoint > > > > > http://www.ece.umd.edu/~antonsen/Data/IRMMW-THz%202013/Extended%20Abstracts/2013-09-03-Tu/TU12-6.pdf > > > > Thanks for posting that reference. And I might draw your attention to my > posting a few mins ago... "Of Metronomes and Molecules..." Once again, we > find ourselves bumping into each other down in this rabbit hole... ;-) > > Yes, looks like there is an emergent meme within the vortices of > cyberspace which we are tuned into this week ... another angle on the > metronome effect would a new kind of phonon cooling (as in laser cooling). > > BTW - if in a nanotube experiment - there does exist a "virtual rabbit > hole" for "virtual cooling" in which bosons at high temperature can > condense, then the inside diameter of the CNT could be such a space. A > Cooper pair of electrons is a composite boson. > > Thus there could be a hybrid or two step regime for LENR which is based on > electron acceleration, via CNT entrapment. (not to mention other > possibilities). > > > >
