All nanoparticles of a certain size have a negative index of refraction as regards to the long wavelengths of infrared light. Short wavelengths are absorbed. It's a matter of geometry.
A mix of particles of various sizes is needed in a Ni/H reactor to form an amalgam. This may be why BIG particles are needed to absorb the infrared light and that infrared energy once absorbed in the big particles is passed via dipole motion to the smaller particles witch usually reflect that long wavelength light. It is my evolving opinion that predestination of some sort was involved in the Ni/H reactor design because Rossi cannot be this smart. On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > SPP happen at the interface between a dielectric a material with a > *negative* index of refraction.(a metal the reflect light). > > should read > > SPP happen at the interface between a dielectric and a material with a > *negative* index of refraction.(a metal the reflect light). > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> SPP happen at the interface between a dielectric a material with a >> *negative* index of refraction.(a metal the reflect light). >> >> Do CNTs qualify. They must if the Chinese say so. >> >> *Negative Refractive Index Metasurfaces for Enhanced Biosensing * >> >> >> *Research as follows:* >> >> Inorganic ultrathin nanocomposites include metals and metal composites, >> various oxides, semiconductor materials, different inorganic compounds but >> also pure elements. Various metals were reported as freestanding >> nanomembrane materials, including chromium, titanium, tungsten, nickel, >> aluminum, silver, gold, platinum; most of these being structural metals >> having both electromagnetic and mechanical functions at the same time. >> Elemental semiconductor nanomembranes were also reported, and among them, >> an especially important mention belongs to silicon freestanding structures, >> which are connected with the most widespread and mature technology. Silicon >> with a thickness ranging between 10 nm and 100 nm was mentioned for >> instance in the context of nanomembrane-based stretchable electronics [95]. >> Buckled silicon nanoribbons and full nanomembranes were also reported [96]. >> *Materials >> **2011*, *4 **7 * >> >> *An important material for nanomembranes in CBB sensor applications is >> carbon, which may be used in membranes in the form of carbon nanotubes [97] >> or as freestanding, ultrathin diamond or diamandoid film [97]. *The >> excellent mechanical properties of such carbon-based materials make them >> convenient for their use as reinforcements for the nanometer-thin >> freestanding structures, but also as the dielectric part of the >> metasurfaces. Other classes of inorganic freestanding nanomembranes include >> oxide, nitride and carbide structures, many of them used either as >> wide-bandgap semiconductors or insulators. Silicon dioxide nanomembranes >> [98] are among the important ones, again because of the widely available >> and mature silicon technology. Other materials include silicon nitride, >> titanium dioxide, gallium arsenide, *etc*. A special class of interest >> for this review belongs to plasmonic materials. These include Drude metals. >> Freestanding gold films with a thickness below 100 nm have been known for a >> long time [99]. In our experiments we fabricated chromium-containing >> nanomembranes down to 8 nm thickness and with areas of tens of millimeters >> square [94,100]. Another possibility to obtain freestanding nanomembranes >> with plasmonic properties is to utilize non-metallic Drude materials like >> transparent conductive oxides (e.g., tin oxide, indium oxide, *etc.*) >> [101,102]. Symmetric plasmonic nanomembranes may be fabricated as laminar >> nanocomposites. Possible implementations include sandwich structures in >> which top and bottom layers are plasmonic material, while the middle layer >> may be any material serving as a support. Figure 1 shows an example of our >> free-floating nanomembrane with an overall thickness of 35 nm and a >> metal-dielectric-metal structure. *Figure 1. *Free-floating laminar >> metal/dielectric/metal nanomembrane, strata thickness 10 nm + 15 nm + 10 >> nm, metal Au, dielectric silica, lateral dimensions 2 cm × 8 mm, support >> polished Si. >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Axil >>> >>> The Chinese paper said: >>> >>> >>>The calculated dispersion curves are shown in Fig. 4. Different from >>> that of the planar structure, in the cylindrical case the electron beam >>> line intersects with >>> >>> dispersion curves at two points of the two modes.<< >>> >>> It seems to say that the SPP phenomenon can occur on plane surface as >>> well as a cylindrical surface. Is this your understanding? It makes CNT >>> even more interesting as a location for SPP to occur. >>> >>> Bob >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>> *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2014 9:44 AM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Resonant photons for CNT ring current >>> >>> 100 megawatts per cm^2 is only 10^8 watts per Cm^2. I have seen in >>> research papers and have posted about 10^15 watts per cm^2 maximum seen in >>> nanoplasmonic research. >>> >>> I suspect that 10^20 watts per cm^2 is produced inside the Ni/H reactor >>> because of the optimized nanoparticle configurations used. >>> >>> This will produce a magnetic field at 10^16 tesla. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Bob Cook >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Well the Chinese paper answers your recent question about what type of >>>> radiation is produced in the SPP phenomena. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Whoa. SPP can produce a radiation power density 100 megawatts per cm^2? >>>> Is that a typo? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That is quite a shock, in more ways than one ...<g> even if the authors >>>> had somehow missed it by a factor of 100... the only question we should be >>>> asking ourselves is: why isn't everyone in LENR jumping on implementing SPP >>>> into their experiments ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Perhaps the reputation of the Terahertz Research Center, School of >>>> Physical Electronics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of >>>> China is not considered by some to be credible? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> No... methinks the core problem is plain old inertia and smugness... of the >>>> First World variety... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> BTW - in terms of education, most of the authors of this paper were >>>> probably educated here. The State Dept says that of the 1,777 physics >>>> doctorates awarded in 2011, a typical year, over a third 743 went to >>>> temporary visa holders - most of whom come from Asia. That should come as >>>> no surprise to anyone walking around the top University physics >>>> departments. >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* MarkI-ZeroPoint >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.ece.umd.edu/~antonsen/Data/IRMMW-THz%202013/Extended%20Abstracts/2013-09-03-Tu/TU12-6.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for posting that reference. And I might draw your attention to >>>> my posting a few mins ago... "Of Metronomes and Molecules..." Once >>>> again, we find ourselves bumping into each other down in this rabbit >>>> hole... >>>> ;-) >>>> >>>> Yes, looks like there is an emergent meme within the vortices of >>>> cyberspace which we are tuned into this week ... another angle on the >>>> metronome effect would a new kind of phonon cooling (as in laser cooling). >>>> >>>> BTW - if in a nanotube experiment - there does exist a "virtual rabbit >>>> hole" for "virtual cooling" in which bosons at high temperature can >>>> condense, then the inside diameter of the CNT could be such a space. A >>>> Cooper pair of electrons is a composite boson. >>>> >>>> Thus there could be a hybrid or two step regime for LENR which is based >>>> on electron acceleration, via CNT entrapment. (not to mention other >>>> possibilities). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
