Axil and Ed—
I do not admit to understanding the effect of temperature in detail. However,
I do consider temperature will change the magnitude of magnetic fields in the
lattice and the vibrational frequencies of the lattice depending upon local
geometry. The latter would effect how the distribution of phonons would or
would not occur at a NAE and hence how the distribution of small packets of
energy from a reaction may or may not happen. Resonant coupling between the
lattice and the reaction species is the crux of understanding the reaction.
Bob
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2014 3:01 PM,
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: 2 Modes of the FPE
More...
The Rossi reaction is a two step operation where the "mouse" produces NAEs and
the "Cat" consumes these NAEs that are mobile one currents of hydrogen.
How else can it work???
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, a guess but a good guess. Rossi's mouse is stimulating the "Cat" with
something that floats on a hydrogen gas current and whose production is
controlled through the application of heat.
Rossi solved his control problem by separating dust bunnies production in one
unit that has a very low Q and is not subject to run away reaction;
independent of a very reactive high Q unit (the Cat) that is essentially
supercritical. The Cat just consumes these dust particles vigorously, but this
stage cannot produce dust bunnies to cause a positive feedback runaway reaction
through a direct thermal connection.
It is so obvious and so simple.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote
Axil, how do you know how I produce the NAE. I do not know this and neither
of us knows how Rossi does this. Your guesses are not useful.
I can comprehend the process you describe. I just do not believe it. Do you
see the difference?
Ed Storms
On Mar 22, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
There is more than one way to skin a cat. LENR active cracks can be
produced in more than one way. The way Rossi produces NAE is different than the
way Ed Storms produces NAE, and Rossi is far more productive and robust at it.
Rossi produces NAE with his “mouse” which is a nano-particle generator.
Nano-particles are attracted to each other and form fractal arrogates. These
arrogates are like dust bunnies that you find under the bed. They enclose
countless nano-cavities that serve as NAE.
Here is pictures of such a fractal abrogate:
http://ej.iop.org/images/1367-2630/11/6/063030/Full/nj311113fig1.jpg
Note the presence of numerous nano-cavities that develops naturally
through electrostatic processes.
When these dust bunnies drift onto the 5 micron micro particles, the
micro particles use dipole vibration to feed power into these NAE inside the
dust bunnies.
I deeply regret that Ed Storms cannot comprehend this simple process. It
would be better for LENR if he did.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
Bob, temperature is not the source of cracks or have any role in their
function. Temperature changes the rate at which hydrogen is delivered to the
crack. It is important to understand the role of each variable. You can find an
explanation at http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEexplaining.pdf.
Ed Storms
On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Ed--
Engineering resonances associated with any given crack characteristic
associated with LENR activation may help expand the useful crack population.
Rossi seems to use temperature as a control.
Bob
From: Edmund Storms
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2014 10:46 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:2 Modes of the FPE
Yes, getting a wide variety of sizes is easy. Getting enough of the
right size in this distribution is the problem. Only a few of the right size
will not give enough energy to be detected. When radiation or tritium is used
to detect the occurrence of LENR, the effect can be seen using fewer active
sites. However, these methods hav e not been used very often, probably because
the tools and skill are not common.
Cracks either want to grow larger or sinter and disappear. As a
result, production of LENR is unstable. This makes the effect occur for brief
times, but not long enough to be sure LENR is actually happening rather than a
random event.
Ed Stormss
On Mar 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, James Bowery wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Edmund Storms
<stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Based on my theory, the active material are nano-cracks. Making
these at the require size is the challenge. Cracks can be made many different
ways, but getting the right size is the problem.
Might there be a technique that generates a wide distribution of
crack sizes?
