DGT was producing steam, not 212 water. The change of state energy from water to steam was not reflected in the COP calculations. Yes this is inaccurate, but gross under estimate of the COP. I am depending on memory, correct me if I have erred.
Jed, you are whipping yourselfer into a frenzy of recombination. Such a negative position will damage your reputation if DGT does have something that you say they don't. A charge of bad judgment might be leveled upon DGT success. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I judge the MIT conference that DGT pulled out of as a sign of disgust >> with the powers that be in the LENR field and the first step at going dark >> to them for DGT. >> > > They pulled out because they knew this scandal would soon break. They knew > the jig was up. > > I knew it too. I have heard from NI and many others that the flow rate was > bogus. I did not know it was as bad as this! I assumed it was a mistake. > > There is world of difference between an honest mistake and a company that > does not allow its own joint venture to take elementary precautions to > confirm the measurements. We all make stupid mistakes from time to time. > But when a company goes out of its way to prevent a proper test, that > stinks. It is tantamount to fraud, even if fraud is not intended. > "Tantamount" meaning it might as well be fraud, for all intents and > purposes. If I were on the jury I would hardly see the need to make the > distinction or prove intent. > > I cannot imagine why Axil is defending these people, when their own > president has clearly stated the flow calorimetry was wrong. He knew that > the day after the ICCF18 demo. He has been covering up ever since. What > more proof of dishonesty and bad faith can you ask for? > > - Jed > >
