more... When the NiH reactor produces more magnetic field force than the biggest and most powerful black hole or neutron star, we should expect some RF interference. Testing such a device is not going to be easy.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is more help to support my memory > > > http://www.lenr-forum.com/old-forum/showthread.php?2185-Defkalion-observe-Huge-magnetic-fields-(1-Tesla)-inside-the-reactor > > on his blog, Matt lewans report > <http://matslew.wordpress.com/2013/07/24/comments-on-defkalion-reactor-demo-in-milan> > what Defkalion CTO said > I forgot to say that according to CTO John Hadjichristos there are HUGE > magnetic fields inside the reactor as a result of the reaction, in the > order of 1 Tesla if I remember right, possibly due to extremely strong > currents over very short distances. Hadjichristos says *the field is > shielded by double Faraday cages*, probably the reactor body and the > external metal cover outside the heat insulation. > > emphasis added > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Refreshing my memory as follows: >> >> https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/newvortex/conversations/topics/584 >> >> <Snip> >> Additional information was provided, that Defkalion had seen >> disruption of electronic equipment by the device, such as their phone >> system being shut down; the measurements reported were with all >> shielding removed; normally, they operate the Hyperion with mu-metal >> and other shielding, to cut down on EMF interference. It is not >> surprising that there could be massive noise, they are stimulating >> the reaction through a high voltage applied to those spark plugs used >> as convenient feed-thrus at either end of the device. Classic spark >> RF signal. Wide-band, mostly illegal nowadays, because of how much >> disruption it can create. Devices that can generate this kind of >> noise must be shielded, or they will be located and shut down. >> <EndSnip> >> >> I seem to remember that the RF interference during the demo was produced >> with a doubly shielded Reactor. >> >> DGT would not be unwise enough to run that ICCF-18 demo with an >> unshielded reactor. >> >> As in nuclear power where neutrons drive the reaction, neutron radiation >> protection is a major issue. In LENR, where EMF drives the reaction, RF >> protection will be a major issue. >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I am going from memory here which could be misapplied. Anyway, DGT >>> remarks associated with the ICCF-18 demo regarding EMF interference leads >>> me to the conclusion that during the demo, DGT first became fully aware of >>> the full extent of the problems caused by the disruptive power that LENR >>> related EMF interference placed on the associated instrumentation during >>> NiH testing. >>> >>> For one thing, DFT observed that the NiH reactor took out the entire >>> phone system throughout the building in which they demoed the NiH reactor. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> It is likely that Gamberale was not away of this *idiocynrocy >>>>> implicate *in the NiH reactor and his test was flawed because of it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, that would not apply during the calibration phase. Gamberale >>>> reported spurious excess heat during calibration with the reactor turned >>>> off, and also when the flow rate was zero. That cannot be anything but an >>>> instrument artifact. >>>> >>>> - Jed >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
