LENR is a misnomer. The concept that this reaction is one of low energy is mostly not accurate. This sort of inaccuracy has lead to much counter-reactions from the orthodox scientific community over many years. The name should be changed to its final form...Magnetically Induced Nuclear Reactions (MINR).
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > From: Peter Gluck > > … can you suggest an acronym that goes well with LENR? > > Yes. If and when Mizuno’s experiment is replicated, and if it is as > reliable > and robust as it was presented to be, then it will have marked a turning > point (or tipping point) in the progression from PF in 1989. > > Seriously, everything prior to early 2014 can be called LENR, but… > > …everything thereafter is MENR (pronounced “meaner”). Mizuno-enhanced- > nuclear-reaction. > > At least, if the new work from others follows Mizuno’s basic formula of > nickel-deuterium plasma, and especially if he gets the kilowatt reactor > running this year – the one pictured in the MIT slides. Imagine a kilowatt > with good proof. > > The MIT presentation will then have been the overlooked tipping point, but > most everyone missed it at first, since it did not fit into preconceived > notions. > > Jones > >
