Sounds too much like MISERY Bob. That is the current state of world affairs.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wed, Aug 6, 2014 3:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New SWOT analysis of the E-cat
Axil--
I disagree that the reaction is totally nuclear, although nuclei are involved.
Orbital spin and both electron and photon spin are probably involved in the
energy redistribution. I agree it is magnetically induced. I consider spin
coupling is involved and the release of energy associated with spin angular
momentum or spin mass. A better handle would be magnetically induced spin
energy redistribution (MISER).
Bob
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 9:00 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
LENR is a misnomer. The concept that this reaction is one of low energy is
mostly not accurate. This sort of inaccuracy has lead to much counter-reactions
from the orthodox scientific community over many years. The name should be
changed to its final form...Magnetically Induced Nuclear Reactions (MINR).
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
From: Peter Gluck
… can you suggest an acronym that goes well with LENR?
Yes. If and when Mizuno’s experiment is replicated, and if it is as reliable
and robust as it was presented to be, then it will have marked a turning
point (or tipping point) in the progression from PF in 1989.
Seriously, everything prior to early 2014 can be called LENR, but…
…everything thereafter is MENR (pronounced “meaner”). Mizuno-enhanced-
nuclear-reaction.
At least, if the new work from others follows Mizuno’s basic formula of
nickel-deuterium plasma, and especially if he gets the kilowatt reactor
running this year – the one pictured in the MIT slides. Imagine a kilowatt
with good proof.
The MIT presentation will then have been the overlooked tipping point, but
most everyone missed it at first, since it did not fit into preconceived
notions.
Jones
