Why is it that a company like BLP, with a published theory, multiple
validations, multiple endorsements from professors of reputable universities,
several demostrations of their technology, several prototypes, a permanent
headquarters and a published schedule and timeline - gets kicked around like
frauds
And yet ....
A company like DGT, with no published theory, zero validations, no endorsements
- in fact 2 endorsements against it, no professors working on it, 1 fraudulent
demonstration with intentional fraudulent measurements, no prototypes (wait ...
1 mythical hyperion prototype), no permanent office address and no schedule and
timeline whatsoever - gets praised and its imaginary technology gets mentioned
in this forum as it it was real.
Get real folks.
So, BLP missed a few previous goals. Named me one company which hasn't.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2014 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
I don't have anything to ask. When I wrote I don't make heads or tails of
their theory, it's not because I cannot understand because it is too hard or I
missing something in the mumbo jumbo. In fact, what I mean is an euphemism for
their theory being not even wrong. What they do is worse than W&L theory,
because at least these won't try to reformulate *all* physics with things that
are known not to work.
What they do is either naive or dishonest. But given that their experiments
display a physical sign that it doesn't work (the fast oxidation of the
electrodes) and the massive money they are always getting plus >20 years of
over excuses, I am compelled to at least to not take them seriously.
2014-08-09 12:09 GMT-03:00 Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
<orionwo...@charter.net>:
But have you, Daniel? Have you tried?
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
